Back to rankings

Model comparison

Selected 2 / 5

See the differences. Choose what matters to you.

Differences vs. Qwen 3.8 Max · default

Compare settings
Quick select
These models share no common effort
Score, cost & time differences

Current baseline · Qwen 3.8 Max · default

64Backend engineering

Compared with Qwen 3.8 Max · default

  • claude-opus-4-8 · max

    Backend engineering: tiedReference cost $8.37 ($7.30 more)Evaluation time 63m 16s (15m 28s more)

Differences reflect these evaluation tasks. Cost and time cover the same dimension, not a typical conversation. Scoring & cost notes

Tested configuration
Effortdefault
Effort
MetricQwen 3.8 Max · defaultclaude-opus-4-8 · max
Backend engineeringQwen 3.8 Maxdefault
64
claude-opus-4-8max
64Tied
OverallQwen 3.8 Maxdefault
55.50
claude-opus-4-8max
75.85+20.35 pts
Frontend interactionQwen 3.8 Maxdefault
69
claude-opus-4-8max
88+19 pts
Knowledge & ReasoningQwen 3.8 Maxdefault
40
claude-opus-4-8max
85+45 pts
Visual aestheticsQwen 3.8 Maxdefault
64
claude-opus-4-8max
68+4 pts
MaintainabilityQwen 3.8 Maxdefault
53
claude-opus-4-8max
55+2 pts

Next, validate with your own work

Try a familiar task with each candidate. Compare the results, revision effort, and actual consumption.

Explore subscriptions for these modelsUsing an API? Refer to the evaluation consumption above. For subscriptions, explore matching plans and estimated runtime.