Back to rankings

Model comparison

Selected 2 / 5

See the differences. Choose what matters to you.

Differences vs. Qwen 3.8 Flash · default

Compare settings
Quick select
These models share no common effort
Score, cost & time differences

Current baseline · Qwen 3.8 Flash · default

50Knowledge & Reasoning

Compared with Qwen 3.8 Flash · default

  • gpt-6-luna · xhigh

    Knowledge & Reasoning: tiedReference cost $0.026 ($0.22 less)Evaluation time 35m 30s (13m 54s less)

Differences reflect these evaluation tasks. Cost and time cover the same dimension, not a typical conversation. Scoring & cost notes

Tested configuration
Effortdefault
Effort
MetricQwen 3.8 Flash · defaultgpt-6-luna · xhigh
Knowledge & ReasoningQwen 3.8 Flashdefault
50
gpt-6-lunaxhigh
50Tied
OverallQwen 3.8 Flashdefault
65.15
gpt-6-lunaxhigh
62.00−3.15 pts
Backend engineeringQwen 3.8 Flashdefault
68
gpt-6-lunaxhigh
62−6 pts
Frontend interactionQwen 3.8 Flashdefault
87
gpt-6-lunaxhigh
80−7 pts
Visual aestheticsQwen 3.8 Flashdefault
73
gpt-6-lunaxhigh
68−5 pts
MaintainabilityQwen 3.8 Flashdefault
57
gpt-6-lunaxhigh
59+2 pts

Next, validate with your own work

Try a familiar task with each candidate. Compare the results, revision effort, and actual consumption.

Explore subscriptions for these modelsUsing an API? Refer to the evaluation consumption above. For subscriptions, explore matching plans and estimated runtime.