Back to rankings

Model comparison

Selected 2 / 5

See the differences. Choose what matters to you.

Differences vs. Qwen 3.8 Flash · default

Compare settings
Quick select
These models share no common effort
Score, cost & time differences

Current baseline · Qwen 3.8 Flash · default

65.15Overall

Compared with Qwen 3.8 Flash · default

  • deepseek-v4-pro · max

    Overall: tiedReference cost $1.15 ($0.74 more)Evaluation time 93m 15s (41m 16s less)

Differences reflect these evaluation tasks. Cost and time cover the same dimension, not a typical conversation. Scoring & cost notes

Tested configuration
Effortdefault
Effort
MetricQwen 3.8 Flash · defaultdeepseek-v4-pro · max
OverallQwen 3.8 Flashdefault
65.15
deepseek-v4-promax
65.15Tied
Backend engineeringQwen 3.8 Flashdefault
68
deepseek-v4-promax
67−1 pts
Frontend interactionQwen 3.8 Flashdefault
87
deepseek-v4-promax
63−24 pts
Knowledge & ReasoningQwen 3.8 Flashdefault
50
deepseek-v4-promax
65+15 pts
Visual aestheticsQwen 3.8 Flashdefault
73
deepseek-v4-promax
70−3 pts
MaintainabilityQwen 3.8 Flashdefault
57
deepseek-v4-promax
59+2 pts

Next, validate with your own work

Try a familiar task with each candidate. Compare the results, revision effort, and actual consumption.

Explore subscriptions for these modelsUsing an API? Refer to the evaluation consumption above. For subscriptions, explore matching plans and estimated runtime.