Back to rankings

Model comparison

Selected 2 / 5

See the differences. Choose what matters to you.

Differences vs. Qwen 3.8 Flash · default

Compare settings
Quick select
These models share no common effort
Score, cost & time differences

Current baseline · Qwen 3.8 Flash · default

87Frontend interaction

Compared with Qwen 3.8 Flash · default

  • claude-opus-5 · max

    Frontend interaction: tiedReference cost $3.20 ($3.15 more)Evaluation time 24m 45s (5m 9s less)

Differences reflect these evaluation tasks. Cost and time cover the same dimension, not a typical conversation. Scoring & cost notes

Tested configuration
Effortdefault
Effort
MetricQwen 3.8 Flash · defaultclaude-opus-5 · max
Frontend interactionQwen 3.8 Flashdefault
87
claude-opus-5max
87Tied
OverallQwen 3.8 Flashdefault
65.15
claude-opus-5max
81.70+16.55 pts
Backend engineeringQwen 3.8 Flashdefault
68
claude-opus-5max
70+2 pts
Knowledge & ReasoningQwen 3.8 Flashdefault
50
claude-opus-5max
95+45 pts
Visual aestheticsQwen 3.8 Flashdefault
73
claude-opus-5max
73Tied
MaintainabilityQwen 3.8 Flashdefault
57
claude-opus-5max
61+4 pts

Next, validate with your own work

Try a familiar task with each candidate. Compare the results, revision effort, and actual consumption.

Explore subscriptions for these modelsUsing an API? Refer to the evaluation consumption above. For subscriptions, explore matching plans and estimated runtime.