Back to rankings

Model comparison

Selected 2 / 5

See the differences. Choose what matters to you.

Differences vs. Qwen 3.8 27b · default

Compare settings
Quick select
These models share no common effort
Score, cost & time differences

Current baseline · Qwen 3.8 27b · default

53.00Overall

Compared with Qwen 3.8 27b · default

  • MiniMax-M3 · high

    Overall: −0.05 ptsComparable cost unavailableEvaluation time 56m 33s (47m 58s less)

Differences reflect these evaluation tasks. Cost and time cover the same dimension, not a typical conversation. Scoring & cost notes

Tested configuration
Effortdefault
Efforthigh
MetricQwen 3.8 27b · defaultMiniMax-M3 · high
OverallQwen 3.8 27bdefault
53.00
MiniMax-M3high
52.95−0.05 pts
Backend engineeringQwen 3.8 27bdefault
64
MiniMax-M3high
46−18 pts
Frontend interactionQwen 3.8 27bdefault
87
MiniMax-M3high
65−22 pts
Knowledge & ReasoningQwen 3.8 27bdefault
20
MiniMax-M3high
50+30 pts
Visual aestheticsQwen 3.8 27bdefault
66
MiniMax-M3high
59−7 pts
MaintainabilityQwen 3.8 27bdefault
59
MiniMax-M3high
44−15 pts

Next, validate with your own work

Try a familiar task with each candidate. Compare the results, revision effort, and actual consumption.

Explore subscriptions for these modelsUsing an API? Refer to the evaluation consumption above. For subscriptions, explore matching plans and estimated runtime.