Model comparison
Selected 2 / 5See the differences. Choose what matters to you.
Differences vs. mimo-v2.6-pro · default
Score, cost & time differences
Current baseline · mimo-v2.6-pro · default
85Frontend interaction
Compared with mimo-v2.6-pro · default
- gpt-6.1-terra · medium
Frontend interaction: tiedReference cost $0.072 ($0.100 less)Evaluation time 1m 2s (61m 33s less)
Differences reflect these evaluation tasks. Cost and time cover the same dimension, not a typical conversation. Scoring & cost notes
| Metric | mimo-v2.6-pro · default | gpt-6.1-terra · medium |
|---|---|---|
| Frontend interaction | mimo-v2.6-prodefault 85 | gpt-6.1-terramedium 85Tied |
| Overall | mimo-v2.6-prodefault 69.25 | gpt-6.1-terramedium 67.20−2.05 pts |
| Backend engineering | mimo-v2.6-prodefault 70 | gpt-6.1-terramedium 55−15 pts |
| Knowledge & Reasoning | mimo-v2.6-prodefault 65 | gpt-6.1-terramedium 75+10 pts |
| Visual aesthetics | mimo-v2.6-prodefault 64 | gpt-6.1-terramedium 47−17 pts |
| Maintainability | mimo-v2.6-prodefault 59 | gpt-6.1-terramedium 59Tied |
Frontend interaction evaluation · Evaluation consumption, not a monthly subscription fee
Cost & time
Frontend interaction evaluation| Metric | mimo-v2.6-pro · default | gpt-6.1-terra · medium |
|---|---|---|
| Reference cost | mimo-v2.6-prodefault $0.17 | gpt-6.1-terramedium $0.072−$0.100 |
| Evaluation time | mimo-v2.6-prodefault 62m 35s | gpt-6.1-terramedium 1m 2s−98.3% |
Capability profiles
Show up to five models. Select names to focus the chart.
Behind each score
Expand to inspect each subaxis.
Backend engineeringSubscores
| Scoring dimension | mimo-v2.6-prodefault | gpt-6.1-terramedium |
|---|---|---|
| Contracts and boundaries | 10 / 20 | 13 / 20 |
| Retries and failures | 15 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| CI and adversarial review | 12 / 20 | 11 / 20 |
| Transactions and consistency | 16 / 20 | 13 / 20 |
| Caching and regression | 17 / 20 | 0 / 20 |
Frontend interactionSubscores
| Scoring dimension | mimo-v2.6-prodefault | gpt-6.1-terramedium |
|---|---|---|
| Layout and adaptation | 20 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
| Interaction behavior | 20 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| State continuity | 15 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Accessibility and feedback | 13 / 15 | 13 / 15 |
| State validation and regression | 17 / 25 | 21 / 25 |
Knowledge & ReasoningSubscores
| Scoring dimension | mimo-v2.6-prodefault | gpt-6.1-terramedium |
|---|---|---|
| Mathematical reasoning | 5 / 15 | 10 / 15 |
| Computer science & AI | 5 / 15 | 15 / 15 |
| Science and engineering | 10 / 10 | 10 / 10 |
| Life sciences and medicine | 15 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Humanities and general knowledge | 30 / 40 | 25 / 40 |
Visual aestheticsSubscores
| Scoring dimension | mimo-v2.6-prodefault | gpt-6.1-terramedium |
|---|---|---|
| Composition | 19 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
| Spacing and alignment | 15 / 20 | 14 / 20 |
| Typography and expression | 16 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Color and surfaces | 19 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| Control styling | 17 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.
MaintainabilitySubscores
| Scoring dimension | mimo-v2.6-prodefault | gpt-6.1-terramedium |
|---|---|---|
| Semantic clarity | 15 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Control-flow organization | 19 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Locality of changes | 17 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| State and lifecycle | 18 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| Implementation economy | 15 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.