Back to rankings

Model comparison

Selected 2 / 5

See the differences. Choose what matters to you.

Differences vs. mimo-v2.6-flash · default

Compare settings
Quick select
These models share no common effort
Score, cost & time differences

Current baseline · mimo-v2.6-flash · default

58Backend engineering

Compared with mimo-v2.6-flash · default

  • deepseek-v4-flash · high

    Backend engineering: tiedReference cost $0.090 ($0.047 more)Evaluation time 11m 36s (24m 0s less)

Differences reflect these evaluation tasks. Cost and time cover the same dimension, not a typical conversation. Scoring & cost notes

Tested configuration
Effortdefault
Effort
Metricmimo-v2.6-flash · defaultdeepseek-v4-flash · high
Backend engineeringmimo-v2.6-flashdefault
58
deepseek-v4-flashhigh
58Tied
Overallmimo-v2.6-flashdefault
56.10
deepseek-v4-flashhigh
60.50+4.4 pts
Frontend interactionmimo-v2.6-flashdefault
71
deepseek-v4-flashhigh
76+5 pts
Knowledge & Reasoningmimo-v2.6-flashdefault
45
deepseek-v4-flashhigh
55+10 pts
Visual aestheticsmimo-v2.6-flashdefault
59
deepseek-v4-flashhigh
61+2 pts
Maintainabilitymimo-v2.6-flashdefault
57
deepseek-v4-flashhigh
53−4 pts

Next, validate with your own work

Try a familiar task with each candidate. Compare the results, revision effort, and actual consumption.

Explore subscriptions for these modelsUsing an API? Refer to the evaluation consumption above. For subscriptions, explore matching plans and estimated runtime.