Model comparison
Selected 2 / 5See the differences. Choose what matters to you.
Available modelsSelected 2 / 5
Differences vs. muse-wonder · xhigh
Score, cost & time differences
Current baseline · muse-wonder · xhigh
80Knowledge & Reasoning
Compared with muse-wonder · xhigh
- k3.1-pro · max
Knowledge & Reasoning: tiedReference cost $2.38 ($0.13 more)Evaluation time 45m 47s (29m 28s more)
Differences reflect these evaluation tasks. Cost and time cover the same dimension, not a typical conversation. Scoring & cost notes
| Metric | muse-wonder · xhigh | k3.1-pro · max |
|---|---|---|
| Knowledge & Reasoning | muse-wonderxhigh 80 | k3.1-promax 80Tied |
| Overall | muse-wonderxhigh 77.05 | k3.1-promax 79.60+2.55 pts |
| Backend engineering | muse-wonderxhigh 77 | k3.1-promax 84+7 pts |
| Frontend interaction | muse-wonderxhigh 85 | k3.1-promax 91+6 pts |
| Visual aesthetics | muse-wonderxhigh 73 | k3.1-promax 68−5 pts |
| Maintainability | muse-wonderxhigh 57 | k3.1-promax 64+7 pts |
Knowledge & Reasoning evaluation · Evaluation consumption, not a monthly subscription fee
Cost & time
Knowledge & Reasoning evaluation| Metric | muse-wonder · xhigh | k3.1-pro · max |
|---|---|---|
| Reference cost | muse-wonderxhigh $2.24 | k3.1-promax $2.38+$0.13 |
| Evaluation time | muse-wonderxhigh 16m 18s | k3.1-promax 45m 47s+180.7% |
Capability profiles
Show up to five models. Select names to focus the chart.
Behind each score
Expand to inspect each subaxis.
Backend engineeringSubscores
| Scoring dimension | muse-wonderxhigh | k3.1-promax |
|---|---|---|
| Contracts and boundaries | 15 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
| Retries and failures | 18 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| CI and adversarial review | 13 / 20 | 13 / 20 |
| Transactions and consistency | 17 / 20 | 19 / 20 |
| Caching and regression | 14 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
Frontend interactionSubscores
| Scoring dimension | muse-wonderxhigh | k3.1-promax |
|---|---|---|
| Layout and adaptation | 18 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Interaction behavior | 20 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| State continuity | 15 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Accessibility and feedback | 13 / 15 | 15 / 15 |
| State validation and regression | 19 / 25 | 21 / 25 |
Knowledge & ReasoningSubscores
| Scoring dimension | muse-wonderxhigh | k3.1-promax |
|---|---|---|
| Mathematical reasoning | 15 / 15 | 15 / 15 |
| Computer science & AI | 5 / 15 | 5 / 15 |
| Science and engineering | 10 / 10 | 10 / 10 |
| Life sciences and medicine | 15 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Humanities and general knowledge | 35 / 40 | 35 / 40 |
Visual aestheticsSubscores
| Scoring dimension | muse-wonderxhigh | k3.1-promax |
|---|---|---|
| Composition | 20 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Spacing and alignment | 17 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Typography and expression | 18 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
| Color and surfaces | 19 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Control styling | 16 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.
MaintainabilitySubscores
| Scoring dimension | muse-wonderxhigh | k3.1-promax |
|---|---|---|
| Semantic clarity | 15 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
| Control-flow organization | 19 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Locality of changes | 15 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| State and lifecycle | 17 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Implementation economy | 17 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.