Back to rankings

Model comparison

Selected 2 / 5

See the differences. Choose what matters to you.

Differences vs. muse-wonder · high

Compare settings
Quick select
Score, cost & time differences

Current baseline · muse-wonder · high

74.90Overall

Compared with muse-wonder · high

  • deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017 · max

    Overall: −0.6 ptsReference cost $0.45 ($2.85 less)Evaluation time 64m 50s (45m 9s more)

Differences reflect these evaluation tasks. Cost and time cover the same dimension, not a typical conversation. Scoring & cost notes

Tested configuration
Effort
Effort
Metricmuse-wonder · highdeepseek-v4.1-flash-1017 · max
Overallmuse-wonderhigh
74.90
deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017max
74.30−0.6 pts
Backend engineeringmuse-wonderhigh
76
deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017max
72−4 pts
Frontend interactionmuse-wonderhigh
78
deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017max
96+18 pts
Knowledge & Reasoningmuse-wonderhigh
80
deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017max
75−5 pts
Visual aestheticsmuse-wonderhigh
68
deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017max
61−7 pts
Maintainabilitymuse-wonderhigh
59
deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017max
53−6 pts

Next, validate with your own work

Try a familiar task with each candidate. Compare the results, revision effort, and actual consumption.

Explore subscriptions for these modelsUsing an API? Refer to the evaluation consumption above. For subscriptions, explore matching plans and estimated runtime.