Model comparison
Selected 2 / 5See the differences. Choose what matters to you.
Available modelsSelected 2 / 5
Differences vs. muse-wonder · default
Score, cost & time differences
Current baseline · muse-wonder · default
72Backend engineering
Compared with muse-wonder · default
- muse-wonder · high
Backend engineering: +4 ptsReference cost $1.19 ($0.28 more)Evaluation time 5m 28s (2m 23s more)
Differences reflect these evaluation tasks. Cost and time cover the same dimension, not a typical conversation. Scoring & cost notes
| Metric | muse-wonder · default | muse-wonder · high |
|---|---|---|
| Backend engineering | muse-wonderdefault 72 | muse-wonderhigh 76+4 pts |
| Overall | muse-wonderdefault 67.30 | muse-wonderhigh 74.90+7.6 pts |
| Frontend interaction | muse-wonderdefault 79 | muse-wonderhigh 78−1 pts |
| Knowledge & Reasoning | muse-wonderdefault 60 | muse-wonderhigh 80+20 pts |
| Visual aesthetics | muse-wonderdefault 68 | muse-wonderhigh 68Tied |
| Maintainability | muse-wonderdefault 59 | muse-wonderhigh 59Tied |
Backend engineering evaluation · Evaluation consumption, not a monthly subscription fee
Cost & time
Backend engineering evaluation| Metric | muse-wonder · default | muse-wonder · high |
|---|---|---|
| Reference cost | muse-wonderdefault $0.91 | muse-wonderhigh $1.19+$0.28 |
| Evaluation time | muse-wonderdefault 3m 5s | muse-wonderhigh 5m 28s+77.4% |
Capability profiles
Show up to five models. Select names to focus the chart.
Behind each score
Expand to inspect each subaxis.
Backend engineeringSubscores
| Scoring dimension | muse-wonderdefault | muse-wonderhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Contracts and boundaries | 14 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Retries and failures | 14 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| CI and adversarial review | 13 / 20 | 12 / 20 |
| Transactions and consistency | 17 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| Caching and regression | 14 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
Frontend interactionSubscores
| Scoring dimension | muse-wonderdefault | muse-wonderhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Layout and adaptation | 17 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Interaction behavior | 18 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| State continuity | 15 / 20 | 10 / 20 |
| Accessibility and feedback | 8 / 15 | 13 / 15 |
| State validation and regression | 21 / 25 | 17 / 25 |
Knowledge & ReasoningSubscores
| Scoring dimension | muse-wonderdefault | muse-wonderhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Mathematical reasoning | 15 / 15 | 15 / 15 |
| Computer science & AI | 5 / 15 | 5 / 15 |
| Science and engineering | 5 / 10 | 10 / 10 |
| Life sciences and medicine | 15 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Humanities and general knowledge | 20 / 40 | 35 / 40 |
Visual aestheticsSubscores
| Scoring dimension | muse-wonderdefault | muse-wonderhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Composition | 19 / 20 | 19 / 20 |
| Spacing and alignment | 16 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| Typography and expression | 17 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| Color and surfaces | 20 / 20 | 19 / 20 |
| Control styling | 16 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.
MaintainabilitySubscores
| Scoring dimension | muse-wonderdefault | muse-wonderhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Semantic clarity | 15 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Control-flow organization | 20 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Locality of changes | 15 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| State and lifecycle | 17 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| Implementation economy | 17 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.