Back to rankings

Model comparison

Selected 2 / 5

See the differences. Choose what matters to you.

Differences vs. muse-wonder · default

Compare settings
Quick select
Score, cost & time differences

Current baseline · muse-wonder · default

72Backend engineering

Compared with muse-wonder · default

  • deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017 · max

    Backend engineering: tiedReference cost $0.12 ($0.79 less)Evaluation time 15m 16s (12m 12s more)

Differences reflect these evaluation tasks. Cost and time cover the same dimension, not a typical conversation. Scoring & cost notes

Tested configuration
Effort
Effort
Metricmuse-wonder · defaultdeepseek-v4.1-flash-1017 · max
Backend engineeringmuse-wonderdefault
72
deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017max
72Tied
Overallmuse-wonderdefault
67.30
deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017max
74.30+7 pts
Frontend interactionmuse-wonderdefault
79
deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017max
96+17 pts
Knowledge & Reasoningmuse-wonderdefault
60
deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017max
75+15 pts
Visual aestheticsmuse-wonderdefault
68
deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017max
61−7 pts
Maintainabilitymuse-wonderdefault
59
deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017max
53−6 pts

Next, validate with your own work

Try a familiar task with each candidate. Compare the results, revision effort, and actual consumption.

Explore subscriptions for these modelsUsing an API? Refer to the evaluation consumption above. For subscriptions, explore matching plans and estimated runtime.