Model comparison
Selected 2 / 5See the differences. Choose what matters to you.
Available modelsSelected 2 / 5
Differences vs. hy4-preview · high
Score, cost & time differences
Current baseline · hy4-preview · high
66.70Overall
Compared with hy4-preview · high
- gpt-5.6-terra · max
Overall: −0.8 ptsReference cost $1.94 ($0.30 more)Evaluation time 133m 2s (85m 39s less)
Differences reflect these evaluation tasks. Cost and time cover the same dimension, not a typical conversation. Scoring & cost notes
| Metric | hy4-preview · high | gpt-5.6-terra · max |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | hy4-previewhigh 66.70 | gpt-5.6-terramax 65.90−0.8 pts |
| Backend engineering | hy4-previewhigh 74 | gpt-5.6-terramax 81+7 pts |
| Frontend interaction | hy4-previewhigh 73 | gpt-5.6-terramax 76+3 pts |
| Knowledge & Reasoning | hy4-previewhigh 65 | gpt-5.6-terramax 55−10 pts |
| Visual aesthetics | hy4-previewhigh 59 | gpt-5.6-terramax 61+2 pts |
| Maintainability | hy4-previewhigh 57 | gpt-5.6-terramax 61+4 pts |
Complete evaluation · Evaluation consumption, not a monthly subscription fee
Cost & time
Complete evaluation| Metric | hy4-preview · high | gpt-5.6-terra · max |
|---|---|---|
| Reference cost | hy4-previewhigh $1.63 | gpt-5.6-terramax $1.94+$0.30 |
| Evaluation time | hy4-previewhigh 218m 41s | gpt-5.6-terramax 133m 2s−39.2% |
Capability profiles
Show up to five models. Select names to focus the chart.
Behind each score
Expand to inspect each subaxis.
Backend engineeringSubscores
| Scoring dimension | hy4-previewhigh | gpt-5.6-terramax |
|---|---|---|
| Contracts and boundaries | 14 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| Retries and failures | 17 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| CI and adversarial review | 12 / 20 | 12 / 20 |
| Transactions and consistency | 16 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| Caching and regression | 15 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
Frontend interactionSubscores
| Scoring dimension | hy4-previewhigh | gpt-5.6-terramax |
|---|---|---|
| Layout and adaptation | 18 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Interaction behavior | 20 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| State continuity | 10 / 20 | 10 / 20 |
| Accessibility and feedback | 11 / 15 | 12 / 15 |
| State validation and regression | 14 / 25 | 19 / 25 |
Knowledge & ReasoningSubscores
| Scoring dimension | hy4-previewhigh | gpt-5.6-terramax |
|---|---|---|
| Mathematical reasoning | 15 / 15 | 10 / 15 |
| Computer science & AI | 10 / 15 | 10 / 15 |
| Science and engineering | 0 / 10 | 0 / 10 |
| Life sciences and medicine | 15 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Humanities and general knowledge | 25 / 40 | 20 / 40 |
Visual aestheticsSubscores
| Scoring dimension | hy4-previewhigh | gpt-5.6-terramax |
|---|---|---|
| Composition | 18 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Spacing and alignment | 16 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
| Typography and expression | 17 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| Color and surfaces | 19 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Control styling | 14 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.
MaintainabilitySubscores
| Scoring dimension | hy4-previewhigh | gpt-5.6-terramax |
|---|---|---|
| Semantic clarity | 15 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Control-flow organization | 18 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Locality of changes | 16 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
| State and lifecycle | 17 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Implementation economy | 17 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.