Model comparison
Selected 2 / 5See the differences. Choose what matters to you.
Differences vs. gpt-6.1-terra · medium
Score, cost & time differences
Current baseline · gpt-6.1-terra · medium
55Backend engineering
Compared with gpt-6.1-terra · medium
- glm-5.3-flash · high
Backend engineering: tiedReference cost $0.018 ($0.097 less)Evaluation time 21m 43s (19m 18s more)
Differences reflect these evaluation tasks. Cost and time cover the same dimension, not a typical conversation. Scoring & cost notes
| Metric | gpt-6.1-terra · medium | glm-5.3-flash · high |
|---|---|---|
| Backend engineering | gpt-6.1-terramedium 55 | glm-5.3-flashhigh 55Tied |
| Overall | gpt-6.1-terramedium 67.20 | glm-5.3-flashhigh 49.60−17.6 pts |
| Frontend interaction | gpt-6.1-terramedium 85 | glm-5.3-flashhigh 76−9 pts |
| Knowledge & Reasoning | gpt-6.1-terramedium 75 | glm-5.3-flashhigh 20−55 pts |
| Visual aesthetics | gpt-6.1-terramedium 47 | glm-5.3-flashhigh 70+23 pts |
| Maintainability | gpt-6.1-terramedium 59 | glm-5.3-flashhigh 59Tied |
Backend engineering evaluation · Evaluation consumption, not a monthly subscription fee
Cost & time
Backend engineering evaluation| Metric | gpt-6.1-terra · medium | glm-5.3-flash · high |
|---|---|---|
| Reference cost | gpt-6.1-terramedium $0.11 | glm-5.3-flashhigh $0.018−$0.097 |
| Evaluation time | gpt-6.1-terramedium 2m 25s | glm-5.3-flashhigh 21m 43s+796.4% |
Capability profiles
Show up to five models. Select names to focus the chart.
Behind each score
Expand to inspect each subaxis.
Backend engineeringSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-6.1-terramedium | glm-5.3-flashhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Contracts and boundaries | 13 / 20 | 6 / 20 |
| Retries and failures | 18 / 20 | 12 / 20 |
| CI and adversarial review | 11 / 20 | 13 / 20 |
| Transactions and consistency | 13 / 20 | 10 / 20 |
| Caching and regression | 0 / 20 | 14 / 20 |
Frontend interactionSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-6.1-terramedium | glm-5.3-flashhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Layout and adaptation | 16 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Interaction behavior | 20 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| State continuity | 15 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Accessibility and feedback | 13 / 15 | 9 / 15 |
| State validation and regression | 21 / 25 | 14 / 25 |
Knowledge & ReasoningSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-6.1-terramedium | glm-5.3-flashhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Mathematical reasoning | 10 / 15 | 5 / 15 |
| Computer science & AI | 15 / 15 | 5 / 15 |
| Science and engineering | 10 / 10 | 0 / 10 |
| Life sciences and medicine | 15 / 20 | 5 / 20 |
| Humanities and general knowledge | 25 / 40 | 5 / 40 |
Visual aestheticsSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-6.1-terramedium | glm-5.3-flashhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Composition | 16 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Spacing and alignment | 14 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
| Typography and expression | 15 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| Color and surfaces | 17 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Control styling | 16 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.
MaintainabilitySubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-6.1-terramedium | glm-5.3-flashhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Semantic clarity | 15 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Control-flow organization | 20 / 20 | 19 / 20 |
| Locality of changes | 15 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| State and lifecycle | 17 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Implementation economy | 17 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.