Model comparison
Selected 2 / 5See the differences. Choose what matters to you.
Available modelsSelected 2 / 5
Differences vs. gpt-6.1-terra · max
Score, cost & time differences
Current baseline · gpt-6.1-terra · max
89Backend engineering
Compared with gpt-6.1-terra · max
- grok-4.7 · high
Backend engineering: −2 ptsReference cost $2.00 ($1.62 more)Evaluation time 77m 29s (69m 33s more)
Differences reflect these evaluation tasks. Cost and time cover the same dimension, not a typical conversation. Scoring & cost notes
| Metric | gpt-6.1-terra · max | grok-4.7 · high |
|---|---|---|
| Backend engineering | gpt-6.1-terramax 89 | grok-4.7high 87−2 pts |
| Overall | gpt-6.1-terramax 80.05 | grok-4.7high 78.55−1.5 pts |
| Frontend interaction | gpt-6.1-terramax 84 | grok-4.7high 80−4 pts |
| Knowledge & Reasoning | gpt-6.1-terramax 85 | grok-4.7high 85Tied |
| Visual aesthetics | gpt-6.1-terramax 64 | grok-4.7high 66+2 pts |
| Maintainability | gpt-6.1-terramax 61 | grok-4.7high 55−6 pts |
Backend engineering evaluation · Evaluation consumption, not a monthly subscription fee
Cost & time
Backend engineering evaluation| Metric | gpt-6.1-terra · max | grok-4.7 · high |
|---|---|---|
| Reference cost | gpt-6.1-terramax $0.38 | grok-4.7high $2.00+$1.62 |
| Evaluation time | gpt-6.1-terramax 7m 56s | grok-4.7high 77m 29s+876.8% |
Capability profiles
Show up to five models. Select names to focus the chart.
Behind each score
Expand to inspect each subaxis.
Backend engineeringSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-6.1-terramax | grok-4.7high |
|---|---|---|
| Contracts and boundaries | 17 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Retries and failures | 17 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| CI and adversarial review | 17 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Transactions and consistency | 18 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
| Caching and regression | 20 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
Frontend interactionSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-6.1-terramax | grok-4.7high |
|---|---|---|
| Layout and adaptation | 18 / 20 | 19 / 20 |
| Interaction behavior | 20 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
| State continuity | 15 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Accessibility and feedback | 10 / 15 | 10 / 15 |
| State validation and regression | 21 / 25 | 15 / 25 |
Knowledge & ReasoningSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-6.1-terramax | grok-4.7high |
|---|---|---|
| Mathematical reasoning | 15 / 15 | 10 / 15 |
| Computer science & AI | 15 / 15 | 15 / 15 |
| Science and engineering | 5 / 10 | 5 / 10 |
| Life sciences and medicine | 20 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Humanities and general knowledge | 30 / 40 | 35 / 40 |
Visual aestheticsSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-6.1-terramax | grok-4.7high |
|---|---|---|
| Composition | 19 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Spacing and alignment | 17 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| Typography and expression | 16 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| Color and surfaces | 18 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Control styling | 16 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.
MaintainabilitySubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-6.1-terramax | grok-4.7high |
|---|---|---|
| Semantic clarity | 15 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Control-flow organization | 20 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Locality of changes | 15 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| State and lifecycle | 18 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| Implementation economy | 17 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.