Model comparison
Selected 2 / 5See the differences. Choose what matters to you.
Available modelsSelected 2 / 5
Differences vs. gpt-6.1-terra · low
Score, cost & time differences
Current baseline · gpt-6.1-terra · low
53Backend engineering
Compared with gpt-6.1-terra · low
- gpt-6.1-terra · medium
Backend engineering: +2 ptsReference cost $0.11 ($0.024 less)Evaluation time 2m 25s (0m 17s more)
Differences reflect these evaluation tasks. Cost and time cover the same dimension, not a typical conversation. Scoring & cost notes
| Metric | gpt-6.1-terra · low | gpt-6.1-terra · medium |
|---|---|---|
| Backend engineering | gpt-6.1-terralow 53 | gpt-6.1-terramedium 55+2 pts |
| Overall | gpt-6.1-terralow 70.70 | gpt-6.1-terramedium 67.20−3.5 pts |
| Frontend interaction | gpt-6.1-terralow 80 | gpt-6.1-terramedium 85+5 pts |
| Knowledge & Reasoning | gpt-6.1-terralow 85 | gpt-6.1-terramedium 75−10 pts |
| Visual aesthetics | gpt-6.1-terralow 53 | gpt-6.1-terramedium 47−6 pts |
| Maintainability | gpt-6.1-terralow 64 | gpt-6.1-terramedium 59−5 pts |
Backend engineering evaluation · Evaluation consumption, not a monthly subscription fee
Cost & time
Backend engineering evaluation| Metric | gpt-6.1-terra · low | gpt-6.1-terra · medium |
|---|---|---|
| Reference cost | gpt-6.1-terralow $0.14 | gpt-6.1-terramedium $0.11−$0.024 |
| Evaluation time | gpt-6.1-terralow 2m 9s | gpt-6.1-terramedium 2m 25s+12.9% |
Capability profiles
Show up to five models. Select names to focus the chart.
Behind each score
Expand to inspect each subaxis.
Backend engineeringSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-6.1-terralow | gpt-6.1-terramedium |
|---|---|---|
| Contracts and boundaries | 13 / 20 | 13 / 20 |
| Retries and failures | 13 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| CI and adversarial review | 12 / 20 | 11 / 20 |
| Transactions and consistency | 15 / 20 | 13 / 20 |
| Caching and regression | 0 / 20 | 0 / 20 |
Frontend interactionSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-6.1-terralow | gpt-6.1-terramedium |
|---|---|---|
| Layout and adaptation | 18 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
| Interaction behavior | 19 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| State continuity | 15 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Accessibility and feedback | 13 / 15 | 13 / 15 |
| State validation and regression | 15 / 25 | 21 / 25 |
Knowledge & ReasoningSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-6.1-terralow | gpt-6.1-terramedium |
|---|---|---|
| Mathematical reasoning | 10 / 15 | 10 / 15 |
| Computer science & AI | 15 / 15 | 15 / 15 |
| Science and engineering | 10 / 10 | 10 / 10 |
| Life sciences and medicine | 15 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Humanities and general knowledge | 35 / 40 | 25 / 40 |
Visual aestheticsSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-6.1-terralow | gpt-6.1-terramedium |
|---|---|---|
| Composition | 19 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
| Spacing and alignment | 14 / 20 | 14 / 20 |
| Typography and expression | 15 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Color and surfaces | 17 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| Control styling | 16 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.
MaintainabilitySubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-6.1-terralow | gpt-6.1-terramedium |
|---|---|---|
| Semantic clarity | 15 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Control-flow organization | 20 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Locality of changes | 15 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| State and lifecycle | 17 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| Implementation economy | 19 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.