Model comparison
Selected 2 / 5See the differences. Choose what matters to you.
Available modelsSelected 2 / 5
Differences vs. gpt-6.1-terra · low
Score, cost & time differences
Current baseline · gpt-6.1-terra · low
85Knowledge & Reasoning
Compared with gpt-6.1-terra · low
- claude-sonnet-5-5 · xhigh
Knowledge & Reasoning: tiedReference cost $0.13 ($0.000 more)Evaluation time 3m 44s (1m 35s less)
Differences reflect these evaluation tasks. Cost and time cover the same dimension, not a typical conversation. Scoring & cost notes
| Metric | gpt-6.1-terra · low | claude-sonnet-5-5 · xhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Knowledge & Reasoning | gpt-6.1-terralow 85 | claude-sonnet-5-5xhigh 85Tied |
| Overall | gpt-6.1-terralow 70.70 | claude-sonnet-5-5xhigh 82.30+11.6 pts |
| Backend engineering | gpt-6.1-terralow 53 | claude-sonnet-5-5xhigh 86+33 pts |
| Frontend interaction | gpt-6.1-terralow 80 | claude-sonnet-5-5xhigh 89+9 pts |
| Visual aesthetics | gpt-6.1-terralow 53 | claude-sonnet-5-5xhigh 73+20 pts |
| Maintainability | gpt-6.1-terralow 64 | claude-sonnet-5-5xhigh 66+2 pts |
Knowledge & Reasoning evaluation · Evaluation consumption, not a monthly subscription fee
Cost & time
Knowledge & Reasoning evaluation| Metric | gpt-6.1-terra · low | claude-sonnet-5-5 · xhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Reference cost | gpt-6.1-terralow $0.13 | claude-sonnet-5-5xhigh $0.13+$0.000 |
| Evaluation time | gpt-6.1-terralow 5m 19s | claude-sonnet-5-5xhigh 3m 44s−29.8% |
Capability profiles
Show up to five models. Select names to focus the chart.
Behind each score
Expand to inspect each subaxis.
Backend engineeringSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-6.1-terralow | claude-sonnet-5-5xhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Contracts and boundaries | 13 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Retries and failures | 13 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| CI and adversarial review | 12 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
| Transactions and consistency | 15 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Caching and regression | 0 / 20 | 19 / 20 |
Frontend interactionSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-6.1-terralow | claude-sonnet-5-5xhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Layout and adaptation | 18 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| Interaction behavior | 19 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| State continuity | 15 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Accessibility and feedback | 13 / 15 | 15 / 15 |
| State validation and regression | 15 / 25 | 17 / 25 |
Knowledge & ReasoningSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-6.1-terralow | claude-sonnet-5-5xhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Mathematical reasoning | 10 / 15 | 10 / 15 |
| Computer science & AI | 15 / 15 | 10 / 15 |
| Science and engineering | 10 / 10 | 10 / 10 |
| Life sciences and medicine | 15 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Humanities and general knowledge | 35 / 40 | 35 / 40 |
Visual aestheticsSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-6.1-terralow | claude-sonnet-5-5xhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Composition | 19 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Spacing and alignment | 14 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
| Typography and expression | 15 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Color and surfaces | 17 / 20 | 19 / 20 |
| Control styling | 16 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.
MaintainabilitySubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-6.1-terralow | claude-sonnet-5-5xhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Semantic clarity | 15 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Control-flow organization | 20 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Locality of changes | 15 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
| State and lifecycle | 17 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| Implementation economy | 19 / 20 | 19 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.