Model comparison
Selected 2 / 5See the differences. Choose what matters to you.
Available modelsSelected 2 / 5
Differences vs. gpt-6.1-sol · max
Score, cost & time differences
Current baseline · gpt-6.1-sol · max
86.60Overall
Compared with gpt-6.1-sol · max
- claude-opus-5-5 · xhigh
Overall: −1.05 ptsReference cost $6.29 ($4.60 more)Evaluation time 61m 15s (0m 54s less)
Differences reflect these evaluation tasks. Cost and time cover the same dimension, not a typical conversation. Scoring & cost notes
| Metric | gpt-6.1-sol · max | claude-opus-5-5 · xhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | gpt-6.1-solmax 86.60 | claude-opus-5-5xhigh 85.55−1.05 pts |
| Backend engineering | gpt-6.1-solmax 95 | claude-opus-5-5xhigh 84−11 pts |
| Frontend interaction | gpt-6.1-solmax 96 | claude-opus-5-5xhigh 87−9 pts |
| Knowledge & Reasoning | gpt-6.1-solmax 90 | claude-opus-5-5xhigh 95+5 pts |
| Visual aesthetics | gpt-6.1-solmax 66 | claude-opus-5-5xhigh 78+12 pts |
| Maintainability | gpt-6.1-solmax 70 | claude-opus-5-5xhigh 64−6 pts |
Complete evaluation · Evaluation consumption, not a monthly subscription fee
Cost & time
Complete evaluation| Metric | gpt-6.1-sol · max | claude-opus-5-5 · xhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Reference cost | gpt-6.1-solmax $1.69 | claude-opus-5-5xhigh $6.29+$4.60 |
| Evaluation time | gpt-6.1-solmax 62m 9s | claude-opus-5-5xhigh 61m 15s−1.5% |
Capability profiles
Show up to five models. Select names to focus the chart.
Behind each score
Expand to inspect each subaxis.
Backend engineeringSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-6.1-solmax | claude-opus-5-5xhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Contracts and boundaries | 19 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| Retries and failures | 20 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| CI and adversarial review | 17 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Transactions and consistency | 19 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Caching and regression | 20 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
Frontend interactionSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-6.1-solmax | claude-opus-5-5xhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Layout and adaptation | 20 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| Interaction behavior | 20 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| State continuity | 20 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Accessibility and feedback | 13 / 15 | 15 / 15 |
| State validation and regression | 23 / 25 | 15 / 25 |
Knowledge & ReasoningSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-6.1-solmax | claude-opus-5-5xhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Mathematical reasoning | 15 / 15 | 15 / 15 |
| Computer science & AI | 15 / 15 | 15 / 15 |
| Science and engineering | 10 / 10 | 10 / 10 |
| Life sciences and medicine | 15 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Humanities and general knowledge | 35 / 40 | 35 / 40 |
Visual aestheticsSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-6.1-solmax | claude-opus-5-5xhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Composition | 19 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Spacing and alignment | 15 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Typography and expression | 18 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Color and surfaces | 19 / 20 | 19 / 20 |
| Control styling | 16 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.
MaintainabilitySubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-6.1-solmax | claude-opus-5-5xhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Semantic clarity | 15 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Control-flow organization | 19 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Locality of changes | 18 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| State and lifecycle | 20 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| Implementation economy | 17 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.