Model comparison
Selected 2 / 5See the differences. Choose what matters to you.
Available modelsSelected 2 / 5
Differences vs. gpt-6.1-sol · low
Score, cost & time differences
Current baseline · gpt-6.1-sol · low
83.90Overall
Compared with gpt-6.1-sol · low
- gpt-6.1-sol · medium
Overall: −0.05 ptsReference cost $1.41 ($0.080 more)Evaluation time 28m 54s (4m 32s more)
Differences reflect these evaluation tasks. Cost and time cover the same dimension, not a typical conversation. Scoring & cost notes
| Metric | gpt-6.1-sol · low | gpt-6.1-sol · medium |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | gpt-6.1-sollow 83.90 | gpt-6.1-solmedium 83.85−0.05 pts |
| Backend engineering | gpt-6.1-sollow 84 | gpt-6.1-solmedium 89+5 pts |
| Frontend interaction | gpt-6.1-sollow 94 | gpt-6.1-solmedium 83−11 pts |
| Knowledge & Reasoning | gpt-6.1-sollow 85 | gpt-6.1-solmedium 90+5 pts |
| Visual aesthetics | gpt-6.1-sollow 75 | gpt-6.1-solmedium 73−2 pts |
| Maintainability | gpt-6.1-sollow 73 | gpt-6.1-solmedium 70−3 pts |
Complete evaluation · Evaluation consumption, not a monthly subscription fee
Cost & time
Complete evaluation| Metric | gpt-6.1-sol · low | gpt-6.1-sol · medium |
|---|---|---|
| Reference cost | gpt-6.1-sollow $1.33 | gpt-6.1-solmedium $1.41+$0.080 |
| Evaluation time | gpt-6.1-sollow 24m 22s | gpt-6.1-solmedium 28m 54s+18.6% |
Capability profiles
Show up to five models. Select names to focus the chart.
Behind each score
Expand to inspect each subaxis.
Backend engineeringSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-6.1-sollow | gpt-6.1-solmedium |
|---|---|---|
| Contracts and boundaries | 17 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
| Retries and failures | 19 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| CI and adversarial review | 13 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
| Transactions and consistency | 16 / 20 | 19 / 20 |
| Caching and regression | 19 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
Frontend interactionSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-6.1-sollow | gpt-6.1-solmedium |
|---|---|---|
| Layout and adaptation | 20 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Interaction behavior | 20 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| State continuity | 20 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Accessibility and feedback | 13 / 15 | 13 / 15 |
| State validation and regression | 21 / 25 | 17 / 25 |
Knowledge & ReasoningSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-6.1-sollow | gpt-6.1-solmedium |
|---|---|---|
| Mathematical reasoning | 15 / 15 | 15 / 15 |
| Computer science & AI | 15 / 15 | 15 / 15 |
| Science and engineering | 10 / 10 | 10 / 10 |
| Life sciences and medicine | 20 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Humanities and general knowledge | 25 / 40 | 35 / 40 |
Visual aestheticsSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-6.1-sollow | gpt-6.1-solmedium |
|---|---|---|
| Composition | 18 / 20 | 19 / 20 |
| Spacing and alignment | 18 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| Typography and expression | 18 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Color and surfaces | 20 / 20 | 19 / 20 |
| Control styling | 17 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.
MaintainabilitySubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-6.1-sollow | gpt-6.1-solmedium |
|---|---|---|
| Semantic clarity | 16 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Control-flow organization | 20 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Locality of changes | 18 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| State and lifecycle | 19 / 20 | 19 / 20 |
| Implementation economy | 17 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.