Model comparison
Selected 2 / 5See the differences. Choose what matters to you.
Available modelsSelected 2 / 5
Differences vs. gpt-6.1-sol · low
Score, cost & time differences
Current baseline · gpt-6.1-sol · low
84Backend engineering
Compared with gpt-6.1-sol · low
- claude-opus-5-5 · max
Backend engineering: tiedReference cost $1.05 ($0.48 more)Evaluation time 9m 29s (1m 6s less)
Differences reflect these evaluation tasks. Cost and time cover the same dimension, not a typical conversation. Scoring & cost notes
| Metric | gpt-6.1-sol · low | claude-opus-5-5 · max |
|---|---|---|
| Backend engineering | gpt-6.1-sollow 84 | claude-opus-5-5max 84Tied |
| Overall | gpt-6.1-sollow 83.90 | claude-opus-5-5max 89.15+5.25 pts |
| Frontend interaction | gpt-6.1-sollow 94 | claude-opus-5-5max 97+3 pts |
| Knowledge & Reasoning | gpt-6.1-sollow 85 | claude-opus-5-5max 100+15 pts |
| Visual aesthetics | gpt-6.1-sollow 75 | claude-opus-5-5max 73−2 pts |
| Maintainability | gpt-6.1-sollow 73 | claude-opus-5-5max 70−3 pts |
Backend engineering evaluation · Evaluation consumption, not a monthly subscription fee
Cost & time
Backend engineering evaluation| Metric | gpt-6.1-sol · low | claude-opus-5-5 · max |
|---|---|---|
| Reference cost | gpt-6.1-sollow $0.57 | claude-opus-5-5max $1.05+$0.48 |
| Evaluation time | gpt-6.1-sollow 10m 34s | claude-opus-5-5max 9m 29s−10.4% |
Capability profiles
Show up to five models. Select names to focus the chart.
Behind each score
Expand to inspect each subaxis.
Backend engineeringSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-6.1-sollow | claude-opus-5-5max |
|---|---|---|
| Contracts and boundaries | 17 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Retries and failures | 19 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
| CI and adversarial review | 13 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
| Transactions and consistency | 16 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
| Caching and regression | 19 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
Frontend interactionSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-6.1-sollow | claude-opus-5-5max |
|---|---|---|
| Layout and adaptation | 20 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Interaction behavior | 20 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| State continuity | 20 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Accessibility and feedback | 13 / 15 | 12 / 15 |
| State validation and regression | 21 / 25 | 25 / 25 |
Knowledge & ReasoningSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-6.1-sollow | claude-opus-5-5max |
|---|---|---|
| Mathematical reasoning | 15 / 15 | 15 / 15 |
| Computer science & AI | 15 / 15 | 15 / 15 |
| Science and engineering | 10 / 10 | 10 / 10 |
| Life sciences and medicine | 20 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Humanities and general knowledge | 25 / 40 | 40 / 40 |
Visual aestheticsSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-6.1-sollow | claude-opus-5-5max |
|---|---|---|
| Composition | 18 / 20 | 19 / 20 |
| Spacing and alignment | 18 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Typography and expression | 18 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Color and surfaces | 20 / 20 | 19 / 20 |
| Control styling | 17 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.
MaintainabilitySubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-6.1-sollow | claude-opus-5-5max |
|---|---|---|
| Semantic clarity | 16 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
| Control-flow organization | 20 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Locality of changes | 18 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| State and lifecycle | 19 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Implementation economy | 17 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.