Model comparison
Selected 2 / 5See the differences. Choose what matters to you.
Available modelsSelected 2 / 5
Differences vs. gpt-6.1-sol · high
Score, cost & time differences
Current baseline · gpt-6.1-sol · high
91Backend engineering
Compared with gpt-6.1-sol · high
- gpt-6.1-terra · max
Backend engineering: −2 ptsReference cost $0.38 ($0.28 less)Evaluation time 7m 56s (10m 15s less)
Differences reflect these evaluation tasks. Cost and time cover the same dimension, not a typical conversation. Scoring & cost notes
| Metric | gpt-6.1-sol · high | gpt-6.1-terra · max |
|---|---|---|
| Backend engineering | gpt-6.1-solhigh 91 | gpt-6.1-terramax 89−2 pts |
| Overall | gpt-6.1-solhigh 84.65 | gpt-6.1-terramax 80.05−4.6 pts |
| Frontend interaction | gpt-6.1-solhigh 96 | gpt-6.1-terramax 84−12 pts |
| Knowledge & Reasoning | gpt-6.1-solhigh 85 | gpt-6.1-terramax 85Tied |
| Visual aesthetics | gpt-6.1-solhigh 70 | gpt-6.1-terramax 64−6 pts |
| Maintainability | gpt-6.1-solhigh 70 | gpt-6.1-terramax 61−9 pts |
Backend engineering evaluation · Evaluation consumption, not a monthly subscription fee
Cost & time
Backend engineering evaluation| Metric | gpt-6.1-sol · high | gpt-6.1-terra · max |
|---|---|---|
| Reference cost | gpt-6.1-solhigh $0.65 | gpt-6.1-terramax $0.38−$0.28 |
| Evaluation time | gpt-6.1-solhigh 18m 11s | gpt-6.1-terramax 7m 56s−56.4% |
Capability profiles
Show up to five models. Select names to focus the chart.
Behind each score
Expand to inspect each subaxis.
Backend engineeringSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-6.1-solhigh | gpt-6.1-terramax |
|---|---|---|
| Contracts and boundaries | 19 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| Retries and failures | 18 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| CI and adversarial review | 17 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| Transactions and consistency | 18 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Caching and regression | 19 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
Frontend interactionSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-6.1-solhigh | gpt-6.1-terramax |
|---|---|---|
| Layout and adaptation | 20 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Interaction behavior | 20 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| State continuity | 20 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Accessibility and feedback | 15 / 15 | 10 / 15 |
| State validation and regression | 21 / 25 | 21 / 25 |
Knowledge & ReasoningSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-6.1-solhigh | gpt-6.1-terramax |
|---|---|---|
| Mathematical reasoning | 15 / 15 | 15 / 15 |
| Computer science & AI | 15 / 15 | 15 / 15 |
| Science and engineering | 10 / 10 | 5 / 10 |
| Life sciences and medicine | 15 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Humanities and general knowledge | 30 / 40 | 30 / 40 |
Visual aestheticsSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-6.1-solhigh | gpt-6.1-terramax |
|---|---|---|
| Composition | 20 / 20 | 19 / 20 |
| Spacing and alignment | 15 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| Typography and expression | 19 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
| Color and surfaces | 19 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Control styling | 16 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.
MaintainabilitySubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-6.1-solhigh | gpt-6.1-terramax |
|---|---|---|
| Semantic clarity | 15 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Control-flow organization | 20 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Locality of changes | 18 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| State and lifecycle | 19 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Implementation economy | 17 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.