Model comparison
Selected 2 / 5See the differences. Choose what matters to you.
Available modelsSelected 2 / 5
Differences vs. gpt-6-luna · medium
Score, cost & time differences
Current baseline · gpt-6-luna · medium
56Frontend interaction
Compared with gpt-6-luna · medium
- gpt-6-luna · high
Frontend interaction: −6 ptsReference cost $0.007 ($0.001 more)Evaluation time 3m 51s (0m 56s more)
Differences reflect these evaluation tasks. Cost and time cover the same dimension, not a typical conversation. Scoring & cost notes
| Metric | gpt-6-luna · medium | gpt-6-luna · high |
|---|---|---|
| Frontend interaction | gpt-6-lunamedium 56 | gpt-6-lunahigh 50−6 pts |
| Overall | gpt-6-lunamedium 39.85 | gpt-6-lunahigh 51.20+11.35 pts |
| Backend engineering | gpt-6-lunamedium 24 | gpt-6-lunahigh 44+20 pts |
| Knowledge & Reasoning | gpt-6-lunamedium 25 | gpt-6-lunahigh 50+25 pts |
| Visual aesthetics | gpt-6-lunamedium 64 | gpt-6-lunahigh 68+4 pts |
| Maintainability | gpt-6-lunamedium 55 | gpt-6-lunahigh 47−8 pts |
Frontend interaction evaluation · Evaluation consumption, not a monthly subscription fee
Cost & time
Frontend interaction evaluation| Metric | gpt-6-luna · medium | gpt-6-luna · high |
|---|---|---|
| Reference cost | gpt-6-lunamedium $0.006 | gpt-6-lunahigh $0.007+$0.001 |
| Evaluation time | gpt-6-lunamedium 2m 56s | gpt-6-lunahigh 3m 51s+31.7% |
Capability profiles
Show up to five models. Select names to focus the chart.
Behind each score
Expand to inspect each subaxis.
Backend engineeringSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-6-lunamedium | gpt-6-lunahigh |
|---|---|---|
| Contracts and boundaries | 9 / 20 | 8 / 20 |
| Retries and failures | 0 / 20 | 10 / 20 |
| CI and adversarial review | 4 / 20 | 9 / 20 |
| Transactions and consistency | 11 / 20 | 11 / 20 |
| Caching and regression | 0 / 20 | 6 / 20 |
Frontend interactionSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-6-lunamedium | gpt-6-lunahigh |
|---|---|---|
| Layout and adaptation | 17 / 20 | 12 / 20 |
| Interaction behavior | 10 / 20 | 9 / 20 |
| State continuity | 12 / 20 | 7 / 20 |
| Accessibility and feedback | 10 / 15 | 9 / 15 |
| State validation and regression | 7 / 25 | 13 / 25 |
Knowledge & ReasoningSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-6-lunamedium | gpt-6-lunahigh |
|---|---|---|
| Mathematical reasoning | 0 / 15 | 5 / 15 |
| Computer science & AI | 0 / 15 | 10 / 15 |
| Science and engineering | 10 / 10 | 10 / 10 |
| Life sciences and medicine | 5 / 20 | 10 / 20 |
| Humanities and general knowledge | 10 / 40 | 15 / 40 |
Visual aestheticsSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-6-lunamedium | gpt-6-lunahigh |
|---|---|---|
| Composition | 19 / 20 | 19 / 20 |
| Spacing and alignment | 15 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| Typography and expression | 17 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
| Color and surfaces | 18 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Control styling | 17 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.
MaintainabilitySubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-6-lunamedium | gpt-6-lunahigh |
|---|---|---|
| Semantic clarity | 15 / 20 | 14 / 20 |
| Control-flow organization | 19 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| Locality of changes | 15 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| State and lifecycle | 17 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Implementation economy | 16 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.