Model comparison
Selected 2 / 5See the differences. Choose what matters to you.
Available modelsSelected 2 / 5
Differences vs. gpt-6-luna · medium
Score, cost & time differences
Current baseline · gpt-6-luna · medium
24Backend engineering
Compared with gpt-6-luna · medium
- MiniMax-M3 · high
Backend engineering: +22 ptsReference cost $0.31 ($0.31 more)Evaluation time 22m 6s (12m 1s more)
Differences reflect these evaluation tasks. Cost and time cover the same dimension, not a typical conversation. Scoring & cost notes
| Metric | gpt-6-luna · medium | MiniMax-M3 · high |
|---|---|---|
| Backend engineering | gpt-6-lunamedium 24 | MiniMax-M3high 46+22 pts |
| Overall | gpt-6-lunamedium 39.85 | MiniMax-M3high 52.95+13.1 pts |
| Frontend interaction | gpt-6-lunamedium 56 | MiniMax-M3high 65+9 pts |
| Knowledge & Reasoning | gpt-6-lunamedium 25 | MiniMax-M3high 50+25 pts |
| Visual aesthetics | gpt-6-lunamedium 64 | MiniMax-M3high 59−5 pts |
| Maintainability | gpt-6-lunamedium 55 | MiniMax-M3high 44−11 pts |
Backend engineering evaluation · Evaluation consumption, not a monthly subscription fee
Cost & time
Backend engineering evaluation| Metric | gpt-6-luna · medium | MiniMax-M3 · high |
|---|---|---|
| Reference cost | gpt-6-lunamedium $0.008 | MiniMax-M3high $0.31+$0.31 |
| Evaluation time | gpt-6-lunamedium 10m 5s | MiniMax-M3high 22m 6s+119.1% |
Capability profiles
Show up to five models. Select names to focus the chart.
Behind each score
Expand to inspect each subaxis.
Backend engineeringSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-6-lunamedium | MiniMax-M3high |
|---|---|---|
| Contracts and boundaries | 9 / 20 | 7 / 20 |
| Retries and failures | 0 / 20 | 11 / 20 |
| CI and adversarial review | 4 / 20 | 4 / 20 |
| Transactions and consistency | 11 / 20 | 9 / 20 |
| Caching and regression | 0 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
Frontend interactionSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-6-lunamedium | MiniMax-M3high |
|---|---|---|
| Layout and adaptation | 17 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Interaction behavior | 10 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| State continuity | 12 / 20 | 10 / 20 |
| Accessibility and feedback | 10 / 15 | 7 / 15 |
| State validation and regression | 7 / 25 | 15 / 25 |
Knowledge & ReasoningSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-6-lunamedium | MiniMax-M3high |
|---|---|---|
| Mathematical reasoning | 0 / 15 | 0 / 15 |
| Computer science & AI | 0 / 15 | 0 / 15 |
| Science and engineering | 10 / 10 | 5 / 10 |
| Life sciences and medicine | 5 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Humanities and general knowledge | 10 / 40 | 30 / 40 |
Visual aestheticsSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-6-lunamedium | MiniMax-M3high |
|---|---|---|
| Composition | 19 / 20 | 19 / 20 |
| Spacing and alignment | 15 / 20 | 14 / 20 |
| Typography and expression | 17 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
| Color and surfaces | 18 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Control styling | 17 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.
MaintainabilitySubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-6-lunamedium | MiniMax-M3high |
|---|---|---|
| Semantic clarity | 15 / 20 | 14 / 20 |
| Control-flow organization | 19 / 20 | 19 / 20 |
| Locality of changes | 15 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| State and lifecycle | 17 / 20 | 12 / 20 |
| Implementation economy | 16 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.