Back to rankings

Model comparison

Selected 2 / 5

See the differences. Choose what matters to you.

Differences vs. gpt-6-luna · low

Compare settings
Quick select
These models share no common effort
Score, cost & time differences

Current baseline · gpt-6-luna · low

25Knowledge & Reasoning

Compared with gpt-6-luna · low

  • Gemini 3.7 Flash High · default

    Knowledge & Reasoning: tiedReference cost $0.007 ($0.008 less)Evaluation time 13m 48s (11m 23s less)

Differences reflect these evaluation tasks. Cost and time cover the same dimension, not a typical conversation. Scoring & cost notes

Tested configuration
Effort
Effortdefault
Metricgpt-6-luna · lowGemini 3.7 Flash High · default
Knowledge & Reasoninggpt-6-lunalow
25
Gemini 3.7 Flash Highdefault
25Tied
Overallgpt-6-lunalow
37.85
Gemini 3.7 Flash Highdefault
51.95+14.1 pts
Backend engineeringgpt-6-lunalow
23
Gemini 3.7 Flash Highdefault
63+40 pts
Frontend interactiongpt-6-lunalow
49
Gemini 3.7 Flash Highdefault
71+22 pts
Visual aestheticsgpt-6-lunalow
64
Gemini 3.7 Flash Highdefault
70+6 pts
Maintainabilitygpt-6-lunalow
51
Gemini 3.7 Flash Highdefault
59+8 pts

Next, validate with your own work

Try a familiar task with each candidate. Compare the results, revision effort, and actual consumption.

Explore subscriptions for these modelsUsing an API? Refer to the evaluation consumption above. For subscriptions, explore matching plans and estimated runtime.