Model comparison
Selected 2 / 5See the differences. Choose what matters to you.
Available modelsSelected 2 / 5
Differences vs. gpt-6-luna · high
Score, cost & time differences
Current baseline · gpt-6-luna · high
44Backend engineering
Compared with gpt-6-luna · high
- gpt-6-luna · xhigh
Backend engineering: +18 ptsReference cost $0.023 ($0.010 more)Evaluation time 17m 54s (6m 8s more)
Differences reflect these evaluation tasks. Cost and time cover the same dimension, not a typical conversation. Scoring & cost notes
| Metric | gpt-6-luna · high | gpt-6-luna · xhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Backend engineering | gpt-6-lunahigh 44 | gpt-6-lunaxhigh 62+18 pts |
| Overall | gpt-6-lunahigh 51.20 | gpt-6-lunaxhigh 62.00+10.8 pts |
| Frontend interaction | gpt-6-lunahigh 50 | gpt-6-lunaxhigh 80+30 pts |
| Knowledge & Reasoning | gpt-6-lunahigh 50 | gpt-6-lunaxhigh 50Tied |
| Visual aesthetics | gpt-6-lunahigh 68 | gpt-6-lunaxhigh 68Tied |
| Maintainability | gpt-6-lunahigh 47 | gpt-6-lunaxhigh 59+12 pts |
Backend engineering evaluation · Evaluation consumption, not a monthly subscription fee
Cost & time
Backend engineering evaluation| Metric | gpt-6-luna · high | gpt-6-luna · xhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Reference cost | gpt-6-lunahigh $0.013 | gpt-6-lunaxhigh $0.023+$0.010 |
| Evaluation time | gpt-6-lunahigh 11m 46s | gpt-6-lunaxhigh 17m 54s+52.1% |
Capability profiles
Show up to five models. Select names to focus the chart.
Behind each score
Expand to inspect each subaxis.
Backend engineeringSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-6-lunahigh | gpt-6-lunaxhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Contracts and boundaries | 8 / 20 | 10 / 20 |
| Retries and failures | 10 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
| CI and adversarial review | 9 / 20 | 9 / 20 |
| Transactions and consistency | 11 / 20 | 13 / 20 |
| Caching and regression | 6 / 20 | 14 / 20 |
Frontend interactionSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-6-lunahigh | gpt-6-lunaxhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Layout and adaptation | 12 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Interaction behavior | 9 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| State continuity | 7 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Accessibility and feedback | 9 / 15 | 10 / 15 |
| State validation and regression | 13 / 25 | 17 / 25 |
Knowledge & ReasoningSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-6-lunahigh | gpt-6-lunaxhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Mathematical reasoning | 5 / 15 | 0 / 15 |
| Computer science & AI | 10 / 15 | 5 / 15 |
| Science and engineering | 10 / 10 | 10 / 10 |
| Life sciences and medicine | 10 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Humanities and general knowledge | 15 / 40 | 20 / 40 |
Visual aestheticsSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-6-lunahigh | gpt-6-lunaxhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Composition | 19 / 20 | 19 / 20 |
| Spacing and alignment | 17 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
| Typography and expression | 16 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| Color and surfaces | 18 / 20 | 19 / 20 |
| Control styling | 18 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.
MaintainabilitySubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-6-lunahigh | gpt-6-lunaxhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Semantic clarity | 14 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Control-flow organization | 17 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Locality of changes | 15 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| State and lifecycle | 15 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Implementation economy | 17 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.