Back to rankings

Model comparison

Selected 2 / 5

See the differences. Choose what matters to you.

Differences vs. gpt-6-luna · high

Compare settings
Quick select
These models share no common effort
Score, cost & time differences

Current baseline · gpt-6-luna · high

51.20Overall

Compared with gpt-6-luna · high

  • Gemini 3.7 Flash High · default

    Overall: +0.75 ptsReference cost $0.13 ($0.092 more)Evaluation time 24m 19s (23m 41s less)

Differences reflect these evaluation tasks. Cost and time cover the same dimension, not a typical conversation. Scoring & cost notes

Tested configuration
Effort
Effortdefault
Metricgpt-6-luna · highGemini 3.7 Flash High · default
Overallgpt-6-lunahigh
51.20
Gemini 3.7 Flash Highdefault
51.95+0.75 pts
Backend engineeringgpt-6-lunahigh
44
Gemini 3.7 Flash Highdefault
63+19 pts
Frontend interactiongpt-6-lunahigh
50
Gemini 3.7 Flash Highdefault
71+21 pts
Knowledge & Reasoninggpt-6-lunahigh
50
Gemini 3.7 Flash Highdefault
25−25 pts
Visual aestheticsgpt-6-lunahigh
68
Gemini 3.7 Flash Highdefault
70+2 pts
Maintainabilitygpt-6-lunahigh
47
Gemini 3.7 Flash Highdefault
59+12 pts

Next, validate with your own work

Try a familiar task with each candidate. Compare the results, revision effort, and actual consumption.

Explore subscriptions for these modelsUsing an API? Refer to the evaluation consumption above. For subscriptions, explore matching plans and estimated runtime.