Model comparison
Selected 2 / 5See the differences. Choose what matters to you.
Available modelsSelected 2 / 5
Differences vs. gpt-6-astra · xhigh
Score, cost & time differences
Current baseline · gpt-6-astra · xhigh
88.80Overall
Compared with gpt-6-astra · xhigh
- claude-opus-5-5 · max
Overall: +0.35 ptsReference cost $13.41 ($6.40 more)Evaluation time 66m 3s (17m 54s less)
Differences reflect these evaluation tasks. Cost and time cover the same dimension, not a typical conversation. Scoring & cost notes
| Metric | gpt-6-astra · xhigh | claude-opus-5-5 · max |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | gpt-6-astraxhigh 88.80 | claude-opus-5-5max 89.15+0.35 pts |
| Backend engineering | gpt-6-astraxhigh 95 | claude-opus-5-5max 84−11 pts |
| Frontend interaction | gpt-6-astraxhigh 96 | claude-opus-5-5max 97+1 pts |
| Knowledge & Reasoning | gpt-6-astraxhigh 95 | claude-opus-5-5max 100+5 pts |
| Visual aesthetics | gpt-6-astraxhigh 75 | claude-opus-5-5max 73−2 pts |
| Maintainability | gpt-6-astraxhigh 61 | claude-opus-5-5max 70+9 pts |
Complete evaluation · Evaluation consumption, not a monthly subscription fee
Cost & time
Complete evaluation| Metric | gpt-6-astra · xhigh | claude-opus-5-5 · max |
|---|---|---|
| Reference cost | gpt-6-astraxhigh $7.01 | claude-opus-5-5max $13.41+$6.40 |
| Evaluation time | gpt-6-astraxhigh 83m 56s | claude-opus-5-5max 66m 3s−21.3% |
Capability profiles
Show up to five models. Select names to focus the chart.
Behind each score
Expand to inspect each subaxis.
Backend engineeringSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-6-astraxhigh | claude-opus-5-5max |
|---|---|---|
| Contracts and boundaries | 19 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Retries and failures | 19 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
| CI and adversarial review | 19 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
| Transactions and consistency | 18 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
| Caching and regression | 20 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
Frontend interactionSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-6-astraxhigh | claude-opus-5-5max |
|---|---|---|
| Layout and adaptation | 20 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Interaction behavior | 20 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| State continuity | 20 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Accessibility and feedback | 13 / 15 | 12 / 15 |
| State validation and regression | 23 / 25 | 25 / 25 |
Knowledge & ReasoningSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-6-astraxhigh | claude-opus-5-5max |
|---|---|---|
| Mathematical reasoning | 15 / 15 | 15 / 15 |
| Computer science & AI | 15 / 15 | 15 / 15 |
| Science and engineering | 10 / 10 | 10 / 10 |
| Life sciences and medicine | 20 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Humanities and general knowledge | 35 / 40 | 40 / 40 |
Visual aestheticsSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-6-astraxhigh | claude-opus-5-5max |
|---|---|---|
| Composition | 19 / 20 | 19 / 20 |
| Spacing and alignment | 16 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Typography and expression | 19 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Color and surfaces | 19 / 20 | 19 / 20 |
| Control styling | 18 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.
MaintainabilitySubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-6-astraxhigh | claude-opus-5-5max |
|---|---|---|
| Semantic clarity | 15 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
| Control-flow organization | 20 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Locality of changes | 16 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| State and lifecycle | 18 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Implementation economy | 16 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.