Back to rankings

Model comparison

Selected 2 / 5

See the differences. Choose what matters to you.

Differences vs. gpt-5.6-terra · low

Compare settings
Quick select
These models share no common effort
Score, cost & time differences

Current baseline · gpt-5.6-terra · low

30Knowledge & Reasoning

Compared with gpt-5.6-terra · low

  • Gemini 3.7 Flash High · default

    Knowledge & Reasoning: −5 ptsReference cost $0.007 ($0.38 less)Evaluation time 13m 48s (17m 1s less)

Differences reflect these evaluation tasks. Cost and time cover the same dimension, not a typical conversation. Scoring & cost notes

Tested configuration
Effort
Effortdefault
Metricgpt-5.6-terra · lowGemini 3.7 Flash High · default
Knowledge & Reasoninggpt-5.6-terralow
30
Gemini 3.7 Flash Highdefault
25−5 pts
Overallgpt-5.6-terralow
—
Gemini 3.7 Flash Highdefault
51.95
Backend engineeringgpt-5.6-terralow
53
Gemini 3.7 Flash Highdefault
63+10 pts
Frontend interactiongpt-5.6-terralow
21
Gemini 3.7 Flash Highdefault
71+50 pts
Visual aestheticsgpt-5.6-terralow
—
Gemini 3.7 Flash Highdefault
70
Maintainabilitygpt-5.6-terralow
—
Gemini 3.7 Flash Highdefault
59

Next, validate with your own work

Try a familiar task with each candidate. Compare the results, revision effort, and actual consumption.

Explore subscriptions for these modelsUsing an API? Refer to the evaluation consumption above. For subscriptions, explore matching plans and estimated runtime.