Back to rankings

Model comparison

Selected 2 / 5

See the differences. Choose what matters to you.

Differences vs. gpt-5.6-terra · high

Compare settings
Quick select
These models share no common effort
Score, cost & time differences

Current baseline · gpt-5.6-terra · high

54.80Overall

Compared with gpt-5.6-terra · high

  • Qwen 3.8 Max · default

    Overall: +0.7 ptsComparable cost unavailableEvaluation time 133m 3s (79m 58s more)

Differences reflect these evaluation tasks. Cost and time cover the same dimension, not a typical conversation. Scoring & cost notes

Tested configuration
Effort
Effortdefault
Metricgpt-5.6-terra · highQwen 3.8 Max · default
Overallgpt-5.6-terrahigh
54.80
Qwen 3.8 Maxdefault
55.50+0.7 pts
Backend engineeringgpt-5.6-terrahigh
65
Qwen 3.8 Maxdefault
64−1 pts
Frontend interactiongpt-5.6-terrahigh
67
Qwen 3.8 Maxdefault
69+2 pts
Knowledge & Reasoninggpt-5.6-terrahigh
45
Qwen 3.8 Maxdefault
40−5 pts
Visual aestheticsgpt-5.6-terrahigh
53
Qwen 3.8 Maxdefault
64+11 pts
Maintainabilitygpt-5.6-terrahigh
47
Qwen 3.8 Maxdefault
53+6 pts

Next, validate with your own work

Try a familiar task with each candidate. Compare the results, revision effort, and actual consumption.

Explore subscriptions for these modelsUsing an API? Refer to the evaluation consumption above. For subscriptions, explore matching plans and estimated runtime.