Model comparison
Selected 2 / 5See the differences. Choose what matters to you.
Available modelsSelected 2 / 5
Differences vs. gpt-5.6-sol · medium
Score, cost & time differences
Current baseline · gpt-5.6-sol · medium
73Backend engineering
Compared with gpt-5.6-sol · medium
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash · max
Backend engineering: tiedReference cost $0.11 ($0.60 less)Evaluation time 30m 52s (19m 41s more)
Differences reflect these evaluation tasks. Cost and time cover the same dimension, not a typical conversation. Scoring & cost notes
| Metric | gpt-5.6-sol · medium | MiniMax-M3.1-Flash · max |
|---|---|---|
| Backend engineering | gpt-5.6-solmedium 73 | MiniMax-M3.1-Flashmax 73Tied |
| Overall | gpt-5.6-solmedium 71.80 | MiniMax-M3.1-Flashmax 73.60+1.8 pts |
| Frontend interaction | gpt-5.6-solmedium 83 | MiniMax-M3.1-Flashmax 75−8 pts |
| Knowledge & Reasoning | gpt-5.6-solmedium 70 | MiniMax-M3.1-Flashmax 80+10 pts |
| Visual aesthetics | gpt-5.6-solmedium 68 | MiniMax-M3.1-Flashmax 66−2 pts |
| Maintainability | gpt-5.6-solmedium 59 | MiniMax-M3.1-Flashmax 61+2 pts |
Backend engineering evaluation · Evaluation consumption, not a monthly subscription fee
Cost & time
Backend engineering evaluation| Metric | gpt-5.6-sol · medium | MiniMax-M3.1-Flash · max |
|---|---|---|
| Reference cost | gpt-5.6-solmedium $0.71 | MiniMax-M3.1-Flashmax $0.11−$0.60 |
| Evaluation time | gpt-5.6-solmedium 11m 11s | MiniMax-M3.1-Flashmax 30m 52s+176.2% |
Capability profiles
Show up to five models. Select names to focus the chart.
Behind each score
Expand to inspect each subaxis.
Backend engineeringSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-5.6-solmedium | MiniMax-M3.1-Flashmax |
|---|---|---|
| Contracts and boundaries | 12 / 20 | 11 / 20 |
| Retries and failures | 17 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
| CI and adversarial review | 12 / 20 | 12 / 20 |
| Transactions and consistency | 15 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
| Caching and regression | 17 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
Frontend interactionSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-5.6-solmedium | MiniMax-M3.1-Flashmax |
|---|---|---|
| Layout and adaptation | 18 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Interaction behavior | 19 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| State continuity | 15 / 20 | 10 / 20 |
| Accessibility and feedback | 10 / 15 | 13 / 15 |
| State validation and regression | 21 / 25 | 17 / 25 |
Knowledge & ReasoningSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-5.6-solmedium | MiniMax-M3.1-Flashmax |
|---|---|---|
| Mathematical reasoning | 10 / 15 | 10 / 15 |
| Computer science & AI | 10 / 15 | 15 / 15 |
| Science and engineering | 5 / 10 | 5 / 10 |
| Life sciences and medicine | 15 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Humanities and general knowledge | 30 / 40 | 30 / 40 |
Visual aestheticsSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-5.6-solmedium | MiniMax-M3.1-Flashmax |
|---|---|---|
| Composition | 19 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Spacing and alignment | 17 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| Typography and expression | 17 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
| Color and surfaces | 19 / 20 | 19 / 20 |
| Control styling | 16 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.
MaintainabilitySubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-5.6-solmedium | MiniMax-M3.1-Flashmax |
|---|---|---|
| Semantic clarity | 15 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Control-flow organization | 20 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Locality of changes | 15 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| State and lifecycle | 17 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Implementation economy | 17 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.