Model comparison
Selected 2 / 5See the differences. Choose what matters to you.
Available modelsSelected 2 / 5
Differences vs. gpt-5.6-sol · low
Score, cost & time differences
Current baseline · gpt-5.6-sol · low
69Backend engineering
Compared with gpt-5.6-sol · low
- gpt-5.6-sol · medium
Backend engineering: +4 ptsReference cost $0.71 ($0.15 more)Evaluation time 11m 11s (2m 39s more)
Differences reflect these evaluation tasks. Cost and time cover the same dimension, not a typical conversation. Scoring & cost notes
| Metric | gpt-5.6-sol · low | gpt-5.6-sol · medium |
|---|---|---|
| Backend engineering | gpt-5.6-sollow 69 | gpt-5.6-solmedium 73+4 pts |
| Overall | gpt-5.6-sollow 66.70 | gpt-5.6-solmedium 71.80+5.1 pts |
| Frontend interaction | gpt-5.6-sollow 78 | gpt-5.6-solmedium 83+5 pts |
| Knowledge & Reasoning | gpt-5.6-sollow 60 | gpt-5.6-solmedium 70+10 pts |
| Visual aesthetics | gpt-5.6-sollow 66 | gpt-5.6-solmedium 68+2 pts |
| Maintainability | gpt-5.6-sollow 64 | gpt-5.6-solmedium 59−5 pts |
Backend engineering evaluation · Evaluation consumption, not a monthly subscription fee
Cost & time
Backend engineering evaluation| Metric | gpt-5.6-sol · low | gpt-5.6-sol · medium |
|---|---|---|
| Reference cost | gpt-5.6-sollow $0.56 | gpt-5.6-solmedium $0.71+$0.15 |
| Evaluation time | gpt-5.6-sollow 8m 31s | gpt-5.6-solmedium 11m 11s+31.1% |
Capability profiles
Show up to five models. Select names to focus the chart.
Behind each score
Expand to inspect each subaxis.
Backend engineeringSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-5.6-sollow | gpt-5.6-solmedium |
|---|---|---|
| Contracts and boundaries | 12 / 20 | 12 / 20 |
| Retries and failures | 15 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| CI and adversarial review | 12 / 20 | 12 / 20 |
| Transactions and consistency | 14 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Caching and regression | 16 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
Frontend interactionSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-5.6-sollow | gpt-5.6-solmedium |
|---|---|---|
| Layout and adaptation | 18 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Interaction behavior | 18 / 20 | 19 / 20 |
| State continuity | 17 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Accessibility and feedback | 10 / 15 | 10 / 15 |
| State validation and regression | 15 / 25 | 21 / 25 |
Knowledge & ReasoningSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-5.6-sollow | gpt-5.6-solmedium |
|---|---|---|
| Mathematical reasoning | 10 / 15 | 10 / 15 |
| Computer science & AI | 10 / 15 | 10 / 15 |
| Science and engineering | 10 / 10 | 5 / 10 |
| Life sciences and medicine | 5 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Humanities and general knowledge | 25 / 40 | 30 / 40 |
Visual aestheticsSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-5.6-sollow | gpt-5.6-solmedium |
|---|---|---|
| Composition | 19 / 20 | 19 / 20 |
| Spacing and alignment | 16 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| Typography and expression | 17 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| Color and surfaces | 19 / 20 | 19 / 20 |
| Control styling | 16 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.
MaintainabilitySubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-5.6-sollow | gpt-5.6-solmedium |
|---|---|---|
| Semantic clarity | 15 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Control-flow organization | 20 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Locality of changes | 15 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| State and lifecycle | 17 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| Implementation economy | 19 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.