Model comparison
Selected 2 / 5See the differences. Choose what matters to you.
Available modelsSelected 2 / 5
Differences vs. gpt-5.6-sol · high
Score, cost & time differences
Current baseline · gpt-5.6-sol · high
65Knowledge & Reasoning
Compared with gpt-5.6-sol · high
- gpt-5.6-sol · xhigh
Knowledge & Reasoning: tiedReference cost $0.91 ($0.13 less)Evaluation time 32m 19s (7m 2s more)
Differences reflect these evaluation tasks. Cost and time cover the same dimension, not a typical conversation. Scoring & cost notes
| Metric | gpt-5.6-sol · high | gpt-5.6-sol · xhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Knowledge & Reasoning | gpt-5.6-solhigh 65 | gpt-5.6-solxhigh 65Tied |
| Overall | gpt-5.6-solhigh 73.70 | gpt-5.6-solxhigh 66.60−7.1 pts |
| Backend engineering | gpt-5.6-solhigh 78 | gpt-5.6-solxhigh 78Tied |
| Frontend interaction | gpt-5.6-solhigh 90 | gpt-5.6-solxhigh 65−25 pts |
| Visual aesthetics | gpt-5.6-solhigh 73 | gpt-5.6-solxhigh 61−12 pts |
| Maintainability | gpt-5.6-solhigh 64 | gpt-5.6-solxhigh 61−3 pts |
Knowledge & Reasoning evaluation · Evaluation consumption, not a monthly subscription fee
Cost & time
Knowledge & Reasoning evaluation| Metric | gpt-5.6-sol · high | gpt-5.6-sol · xhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Reference cost | gpt-5.6-solhigh $1.03 | gpt-5.6-solxhigh $0.91−$0.13 |
| Evaluation time | gpt-5.6-solhigh 25m 18s | gpt-5.6-solxhigh 32m 19s+27.8% |
Capability profiles
Show up to five models. Select names to focus the chart.
Behind each score
Expand to inspect each subaxis.
Backend engineeringSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-5.6-solhigh | gpt-5.6-solxhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Contracts and boundaries | 17 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Retries and failures | 18 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| CI and adversarial review | 13 / 20 | 10 / 20 |
| Transactions and consistency | 16 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Caching and regression | 14 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
Frontend interactionSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-5.6-solhigh | gpt-5.6-solxhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Layout and adaptation | 18 / 20 | 13 / 20 |
| Interaction behavior | 20 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| State continuity | 20 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Accessibility and feedback | 13 / 15 | 5 / 15 |
| State validation and regression | 19 / 25 | 15 / 25 |
Knowledge & ReasoningSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-5.6-solhigh | gpt-5.6-solxhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Mathematical reasoning | 10 / 15 | 15 / 15 |
| Computer science & AI | 5 / 15 | 5 / 15 |
| Science and engineering | 10 / 10 | 5 / 10 |
| Life sciences and medicine | 15 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Humanities and general knowledge | 25 / 40 | 25 / 40 |
Visual aestheticsSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-5.6-solhigh | gpt-5.6-solxhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Composition | 19 / 20 | 19 / 20 |
| Spacing and alignment | 18 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| Typography and expression | 17 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
| Color and surfaces | 20 / 20 | 19 / 20 |
| Control styling | 16 / 20 | 14 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.
MaintainabilitySubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-5.6-solhigh | gpt-5.6-solxhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Semantic clarity | 15 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
| Control-flow organization | 20 / 20 | 19 / 20 |
| Locality of changes | 16 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| State and lifecycle | 18 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Implementation economy | 17 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.