Model comparison
Selected 2 / 5See the differences. Choose what matters to you.
Available modelsSelected 2 / 5
Differences vs. gpt-5.6-sol · high
Score, cost & time differences
Current baseline · gpt-5.6-sol · high
90Frontend interaction
Compared with gpt-5.6-sol · high
- claude-sonnet-5-5 · xhigh
Frontend interaction: −1 ptsReference cost $1.17 ($0.89 more)Evaluation time 29m 45s (9m 15s more)
Differences reflect these evaluation tasks. Cost and time cover the same dimension, not a typical conversation. Scoring & cost notes
| Metric | gpt-5.6-sol · high | claude-sonnet-5-5 · xhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Frontend interaction | gpt-5.6-solhigh 90 | claude-sonnet-5-5xhigh 89−1 pts |
| Overall | gpt-5.6-solhigh 73.70 | claude-sonnet-5-5xhigh 82.30+8.6 pts |
| Backend engineering | gpt-5.6-solhigh 78 | claude-sonnet-5-5xhigh 86+8 pts |
| Knowledge & Reasoning | gpt-5.6-solhigh 65 | claude-sonnet-5-5xhigh 85+20 pts |
| Visual aesthetics | gpt-5.6-solhigh 73 | claude-sonnet-5-5xhigh 73Tied |
| Maintainability | gpt-5.6-solhigh 64 | claude-sonnet-5-5xhigh 66+2 pts |
Frontend interaction evaluation · Evaluation consumption, not a monthly subscription fee
Cost & time
Frontend interaction evaluation| Metric | gpt-5.6-sol · high | claude-sonnet-5-5 · xhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Reference cost | gpt-5.6-solhigh $0.28 | claude-sonnet-5-5xhigh $1.17+$0.89 |
| Evaluation time | gpt-5.6-solhigh 20m 30s | claude-sonnet-5-5xhigh 29m 45s+45.1% |
Capability profiles
Show up to five models. Select names to focus the chart.
Behind each score
Expand to inspect each subaxis.
Backend engineeringSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-5.6-solhigh | claude-sonnet-5-5xhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Contracts and boundaries | 17 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Retries and failures | 18 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| CI and adversarial review | 13 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
| Transactions and consistency | 16 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Caching and regression | 14 / 20 | 19 / 20 |
Frontend interactionSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-5.6-solhigh | claude-sonnet-5-5xhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Layout and adaptation | 18 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| Interaction behavior | 20 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| State continuity | 20 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Accessibility and feedback | 13 / 15 | 15 / 15 |
| State validation and regression | 19 / 25 | 17 / 25 |
Knowledge & ReasoningSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-5.6-solhigh | claude-sonnet-5-5xhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Mathematical reasoning | 10 / 15 | 10 / 15 |
| Computer science & AI | 5 / 15 | 10 / 15 |
| Science and engineering | 10 / 10 | 10 / 10 |
| Life sciences and medicine | 15 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Humanities and general knowledge | 25 / 40 | 35 / 40 |
Visual aestheticsSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-5.6-solhigh | claude-sonnet-5-5xhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Composition | 19 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Spacing and alignment | 18 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
| Typography and expression | 17 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Color and surfaces | 20 / 20 | 19 / 20 |
| Control styling | 16 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.
MaintainabilitySubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-5.6-solhigh | claude-sonnet-5-5xhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Semantic clarity | 15 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Control-flow organization | 20 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Locality of changes | 16 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
| State and lifecycle | 18 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| Implementation economy | 17 / 20 | 19 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.