Model comparison
Selected 2 / 5See the differences. Choose what matters to you.
Available modelsSelected 2 / 5
Differences vs. gpt-5.6-luna · xhigh
Score, cost & time differences
Current baseline · gpt-5.6-luna · xhigh
83Frontend interaction
Compared with gpt-5.6-luna · xhigh
- Gemini 4 Argon · high
Frontend interaction: +1 ptsComparable cost unavailableEvaluation time 19m 55s (6m 56s more)
Differences reflect these evaluation tasks. Cost and time cover the same dimension, not a typical conversation. Scoring & cost notes
| Metric | gpt-5.6-luna · xhigh | Gemini 4 Argon · high |
|---|---|---|
| Frontend interaction | gpt-5.6-lunaxhigh 83 | Gemini 4 Argonhigh 84+1 pts |
| Overall | gpt-5.6-lunaxhigh 52.35 | Gemini 4 Argonhigh 79.35+27 pts |
| Backend engineering | gpt-5.6-lunaxhigh 56 | Gemini 4 Argonhigh 82+26 pts |
| Knowledge & Reasoning | gpt-5.6-lunaxhigh 25 | Gemini 4 Argonhigh 85+60 pts |
| Visual aesthetics | gpt-5.6-lunaxhigh 66 | Gemini 4 Argonhigh 70+4 pts |
| Maintainability | gpt-5.6-lunaxhigh 59 | Gemini 4 Argonhigh 59Tied |
Frontend interaction evaluation · Evaluation consumption, not a monthly subscription fee
Cost & time
Frontend interaction evaluation| Metric | gpt-5.6-luna · xhigh | Gemini 4 Argon · high |
|---|---|---|
| Reference cost | gpt-5.6-lunaxhigh $0.025 | Gemini 4 Argonhigh N/A |
| Evaluation time | gpt-5.6-lunaxhigh 12m 59s | Gemini 4 Argonhigh 19m 55s+53.5% |
Capability profiles
Show up to five models. Select names to focus the chart.
Behind each score
Expand to inspect each subaxis.
Backend engineeringSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-5.6-lunaxhigh | Gemini 4 Argonhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Contracts and boundaries | 8 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| Retries and failures | 15 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| CI and adversarial review | 13 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Transactions and consistency | 12 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Caching and regression | 8 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
Frontend interactionSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-5.6-lunaxhigh | Gemini 4 Argonhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Layout and adaptation | 18 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| Interaction behavior | 20 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| State continuity | 15 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Accessibility and feedback | 13 / 15 | 12 / 15 |
| State validation and regression | 17 / 25 | 15 / 25 |
Knowledge & ReasoningSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-5.6-lunaxhigh | Gemini 4 Argonhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Mathematical reasoning | 5 / 15 | 10 / 15 |
| Computer science & AI | 0 / 15 | 15 / 15 |
| Science and engineering | 0 / 10 | 10 / 10 |
| Life sciences and medicine | 5 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Humanities and general knowledge | 15 / 40 | 35 / 40 |
Visual aestheticsSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-5.6-lunaxhigh | Gemini 4 Argonhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Composition | 19 / 20 | 19 / 20 |
| Spacing and alignment | 16 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| Typography and expression | 17 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Color and surfaces | 19 / 20 | 19 / 20 |
| Control styling | 16 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.
MaintainabilitySubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-5.6-lunaxhigh | Gemini 4 Argonhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Semantic clarity | 15 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Control-flow organization | 20 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Locality of changes | 15 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| State and lifecycle | 18 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| Implementation economy | 16 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.