Back to rankings

Model comparison

Selected 2 / 5

See the differences. Choose what matters to you.

Differences vs. gpt-5.6-luna · xhigh

Compare settings
Quick select
These models share no common effort
Score, cost & time differences

Current baseline · gpt-5.6-luna · xhigh

25Knowledge & Reasoning

Compared with gpt-5.6-luna · xhigh

  • Gemini 3.7 Flash High · default

    Knowledge & Reasoning: tiedReference cost $0.007 ($0.061 less)Evaluation time 13m 48s (25m 27s less)

Differences reflect these evaluation tasks. Cost and time cover the same dimension, not a typical conversation. Scoring & cost notes

Tested configuration
Effort
Effortdefault
Metricgpt-5.6-luna · xhighGemini 3.7 Flash High · default
Knowledge & Reasoninggpt-5.6-lunaxhigh
25
Gemini 3.7 Flash Highdefault
25Tied
Overallgpt-5.6-lunaxhigh
52.35
Gemini 3.7 Flash Highdefault
51.95−0.4 pts
Backend engineeringgpt-5.6-lunaxhigh
56
Gemini 3.7 Flash Highdefault
63+7 pts
Frontend interactiongpt-5.6-lunaxhigh
83
Gemini 3.7 Flash Highdefault
71−12 pts
Visual aestheticsgpt-5.6-lunaxhigh
66
Gemini 3.7 Flash Highdefault
70+4 pts
Maintainabilitygpt-5.6-lunaxhigh
59
Gemini 3.7 Flash Highdefault
59Tied

Next, validate with your own work

Try a familiar task with each candidate. Compare the results, revision effort, and actual consumption.

Explore subscriptions for these modelsUsing an API? Refer to the evaluation consumption above. For subscriptions, explore matching plans and estimated runtime.