Model comparison
Selected 2 / 5See the differences. Choose what matters to you.
Differences vs. gpt-5.6-luna · medium
Score, cost & time differences
Current baseline · gpt-5.6-luna · medium
25Knowledge & Reasoning
Compared with gpt-5.6-luna · medium
- gpt-5.6-luna · high
Knowledge & Reasoning: −10 ptsReference cost $0.051 ($0.015 more)Evaluation time 5m 3s (2m 12s more)
Differences reflect these evaluation tasks. Cost and time cover the same dimension, not a typical conversation. Scoring & cost notes
| Metric | gpt-5.6-luna · medium | gpt-5.6-luna · high |
|---|---|---|
| Knowledge & Reasoning | gpt-5.6-lunamedium 25 | gpt-5.6-lunahigh 15−10 pts |
| Overall | gpt-5.6-lunamedium — | gpt-5.6-lunahigh 38.30 |
| Backend engineering | gpt-5.6-lunamedium 51 | gpt-5.6-lunahigh 49−2 pts |
| Frontend interaction | gpt-5.6-lunamedium 13 | gpt-5.6-lunahigh 52+39 pts |
| Visual aesthetics | gpt-5.6-lunamedium — | gpt-5.6-lunahigh 55 |
| Maintainability | gpt-5.6-lunamedium — | gpt-5.6-lunahigh 46 |
Knowledge & Reasoning evaluation · Evaluation consumption, not a monthly subscription fee
Cost & time
Knowledge & Reasoning evaluation| Metric | gpt-5.6-luna · medium | gpt-5.6-luna · high |
|---|---|---|
| Reference cost | gpt-5.6-lunamedium $0.036 | gpt-5.6-lunahigh $0.051+$0.015 |
| Evaluation time | gpt-5.6-lunamedium 2m 51s | gpt-5.6-lunahigh 5m 3s+77.1% |
Capability profiles
Show up to five models. Select names to focus the chart.
Behind each score
Expand to inspect each subaxis.
Backend engineeringSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-5.6-lunamedium | gpt-5.6-lunahigh |
|---|---|---|
| Contracts and boundaries | 8 / 20 | 0 / 20 |
| Retries and failures | 13 / 20 | 12 / 20 |
| CI and adversarial review | 3 / 20 | 9 / 20 |
| Transactions and consistency | 11 / 20 | 14 / 20 |
| Caching and regression | 16 / 20 | 14 / 20 |
Frontend interactionSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-5.6-lunamedium | gpt-5.6-lunahigh |
|---|---|---|
| Layout and adaptation | 0 / 20 | 13 / 20 |
| Interaction behavior | 0 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| State continuity | 0 / 20 | 5 / 20 |
| Accessibility and feedback | 0 / 15 | 4 / 15 |
| State validation and regression | 13 / 25 | 13 / 25 |
Knowledge & ReasoningSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-5.6-lunamedium | gpt-5.6-lunahigh |
|---|---|---|
| Mathematical reasoning | 5 / 15 | 0 / 15 |
| Computer science & AI | 0 / 15 | 0 / 15 |
| Science and engineering | 5 / 10 | 0 / 10 |
| Life sciences and medicine | 5 / 20 | 0 / 20 |
| Humanities and general knowledge | 10 / 40 | 15 / 40 |
Visual aestheticsSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-5.6-lunamedium | gpt-5.6-lunahigh |
|---|---|---|
| Composition | — | 19 / 20 |
| Spacing and alignment | — | 15 / 20 |
| Typography and expression | — | 15 / 20 |
| Color and surfaces | — | 19 / 20 |
| Control styling | — | 14 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.
MaintainabilitySubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-5.6-lunamedium | gpt-5.6-lunahigh |
|---|---|---|
| Semantic clarity | — | 15 / 20 |
| Control-flow organization | — | 16 / 20 |
| Locality of changes | — | 15 / 20 |
| State and lifecycle | — | 17 / 20 |
| Implementation economy | — | 14 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.