Back to rankings

Model comparison

Selected 2 / 5

See the differences. Choose what matters to you.

Differences vs. gpt-5.6-luna · medium

Compare settings
Quick select
These models share no common effort
Score, cost & time differences

Current baseline · gpt-5.6-luna · medium

25Knowledge & Reasoning

Compared with gpt-5.6-luna · medium

  • Gemini 3.7 Flash High · default

    Knowledge & Reasoning: tiedReference cost $0.007 ($0.030 less)Evaluation time 13m 48s (10m 57s more)

Differences reflect these evaluation tasks. Cost and time cover the same dimension, not a typical conversation. Scoring & cost notes

Tested configuration
Effort
Effortdefault
Metricgpt-5.6-luna · mediumGemini 3.7 Flash High · default
Knowledge & Reasoninggpt-5.6-lunamedium
25
Gemini 3.7 Flash Highdefault
25Tied
Overallgpt-5.6-lunamedium
—
Gemini 3.7 Flash Highdefault
51.95
Backend engineeringgpt-5.6-lunamedium
51
Gemini 3.7 Flash Highdefault
63+12 pts
Frontend interactiongpt-5.6-lunamedium
13
Gemini 3.7 Flash Highdefault
71+58 pts
Visual aestheticsgpt-5.6-lunamedium
—
Gemini 3.7 Flash Highdefault
70
Maintainabilitygpt-5.6-lunamedium
—
Gemini 3.7 Flash Highdefault
59

Next, validate with your own work

Try a familiar task with each candidate. Compare the results, revision effort, and actual consumption.

Explore subscriptions for these modelsUsing an API? Refer to the evaluation consumption above. For subscriptions, explore matching plans and estimated runtime.