Model comparison
Selected 2 / 5See the differences. Choose what matters to you.
Available modelsSelected 2 / 5
Differences vs. gpt-5.6-luna · max
Score, cost & time differences
Current baseline · gpt-5.6-luna · max
65Backend engineering
Compared with gpt-5.6-luna · max
- grok-bot · Undisclosed
Backend engineering: tiedComparable cost unavailableEvaluation time 13m 12s (35m 14s less)
Differences reflect these evaluation tasks. Cost and time cover the same dimension, not a typical conversation. Scoring & cost notes
| Metric | gpt-5.6-luna · max | grok-bot · Undisclosed |
|---|---|---|
| Backend engineering | gpt-5.6-lunamax 65 | grok-botUndisclosed 65Tied |
| Overall | gpt-5.6-lunamax 52.30 | grok-botUndisclosed 76.35+24.05 pts |
| Frontend interaction | gpt-5.6-lunamax 78 | grok-botUndisclosed 70−8 pts |
| Knowledge & Reasoning | gpt-5.6-lunamax 25 | grok-botUndisclosed 95+70 pts |
| Visual aesthetics | gpt-5.6-lunamax 59 | grok-botUndisclosed 68+9 pts |
| Maintainability | gpt-5.6-lunamax 61 | grok-botUndisclosed 59−2 pts |
Backend engineering evaluation · Evaluation consumption, not a monthly subscription fee
Cost & time
Backend engineering evaluation| Metric | gpt-5.6-luna · max | grok-bot · Undisclosed |
|---|---|---|
| Reference cost | gpt-5.6-lunamax $0.17 | grok-botUndisclosed N/A |
| Evaluation time | gpt-5.6-lunamax 48m 26s | grok-botUndisclosed 13m 12s−72.7% |
Capability profiles
Show up to five models. Select names to focus the chart.
Behind each score
Expand to inspect each subaxis.
Backend engineeringSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-5.6-lunamax | grok-botUndisclosed |
|---|---|---|
| Contracts and boundaries | 7 / 20 | 9 / 20 |
| Retries and failures | 15 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| CI and adversarial review | 13 / 20 | 11 / 20 |
| Transactions and consistency | 16 / 20 | 14 / 20 |
| Caching and regression | 14 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
Frontend interactionSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-5.6-lunamax | grok-botUndisclosed |
|---|---|---|
| Layout and adaptation | 18 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
| Interaction behavior | 19 / 20 | 19 / 20 |
| State continuity | 13 / 20 | 10 / 20 |
| Accessibility and feedback | 13 / 15 | 10 / 15 |
| State validation and regression | 15 / 25 | 15 / 25 |
Knowledge & ReasoningSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-5.6-lunamax | grok-botUndisclosed |
|---|---|---|
| Mathematical reasoning | 10 / 15 | 15 / 15 |
| Computer science & AI | 0 / 15 | 15 / 15 |
| Science and engineering | 0 / 10 | 10 / 10 |
| Life sciences and medicine | 0 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Humanities and general knowledge | 15 / 40 | 35 / 40 |
Visual aestheticsSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-5.6-lunamax | grok-botUndisclosed |
|---|---|---|
| Composition | 17 / 20 | 19 / 20 |
| Spacing and alignment | 17 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Typography and expression | 15 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| Color and surfaces | 19 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Control styling | 16 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.
MaintainabilitySubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-5.6-lunamax | grok-botUndisclosed |
|---|---|---|
| Semantic clarity | 16 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Control-flow organization | 20 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Locality of changes | 15 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| State and lifecycle | 18 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| Implementation economy | 16 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.