Back to rankings

Model comparison

Selected 2 / 5

See the differences. Choose what matters to you.

Differences vs. gpt-5.6-luna · high

Compare settings
Quick select
These models share no common effort
Score, cost & time differences

Current baseline · gpt-5.6-luna · high

15Knowledge & Reasoning

Compared with gpt-5.6-luna · high

  • Qwen 3.8 27b · default

    Knowledge & Reasoning: +5 ptsReference cost $1.12 ($1.07 more)Evaluation time 55m 1s (49m 58s more)

Differences reflect these evaluation tasks. Cost and time cover the same dimension, not a typical conversation. Scoring & cost notes

Tested configuration
Effort
Effortdefault
Metricgpt-5.6-luna · highQwen 3.8 27b · default
Knowledge & Reasoninggpt-5.6-lunahigh
15
Qwen 3.8 27bdefault
20+5 pts
Overallgpt-5.6-lunahigh
38.30
Qwen 3.8 27bdefault
53.00+14.7 pts
Backend engineeringgpt-5.6-lunahigh
49
Qwen 3.8 27bdefault
64+15 pts
Frontend interactiongpt-5.6-lunahigh
52
Qwen 3.8 27bdefault
87+35 pts
Visual aestheticsgpt-5.6-lunahigh
55
Qwen 3.8 27bdefault
66+11 pts
Maintainabilitygpt-5.6-lunahigh
46
Qwen 3.8 27bdefault
59+13 pts

Next, validate with your own work

Try a familiar task with each candidate. Compare the results, revision effort, and actual consumption.

Explore subscriptions for these modelsUsing an API? Refer to the evaluation consumption above. For subscriptions, explore matching plans and estimated runtime.