Model comparison
Selected 2 / 5See the differences. Choose what matters to you.
Available modelsSelected 2 / 5
Differences vs. gpt-5.6-luna · high
Score, cost & time differences
Current baseline · gpt-5.6-luna · high
38.30Overall
Compared with gpt-5.6-luna · high
- gpt-5.6-luna · xhigh
Overall: +14.05 ptsReference cost $0.16 ($0.027 more)Evaluation time 75m 23s (43m 5s more)
Differences reflect these evaluation tasks. Cost and time cover the same dimension, not a typical conversation. Scoring & cost notes
| Metric | gpt-5.6-luna · high | gpt-5.6-luna · xhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | gpt-5.6-lunahigh 38.30 | gpt-5.6-lunaxhigh 52.35+14.05 pts |
| Backend engineering | gpt-5.6-lunahigh 49 | gpt-5.6-lunaxhigh 56+7 pts |
| Frontend interaction | gpt-5.6-lunahigh 52 | gpt-5.6-lunaxhigh 83+31 pts |
| Knowledge & Reasoning | gpt-5.6-lunahigh 15 | gpt-5.6-lunaxhigh 25+10 pts |
| Visual aesthetics | gpt-5.6-lunahigh 55 | gpt-5.6-lunaxhigh 66+11 pts |
| Maintainability | gpt-5.6-lunahigh 46 | gpt-5.6-lunaxhigh 59+13 pts |
Complete evaluation · Evaluation consumption, not a monthly subscription fee
Cost & time
Complete evaluation| Metric | gpt-5.6-luna · high | gpt-5.6-luna · xhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Reference cost | gpt-5.6-lunahigh $0.14 | gpt-5.6-lunaxhigh $0.16+$0.027 |
| Evaluation time | gpt-5.6-lunahigh 32m 18s | gpt-5.6-lunaxhigh 75m 23s+133.4% |
Capability profiles
Show up to five models. Select names to focus the chart.
Behind each score
Expand to inspect each subaxis.
Backend engineeringSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-5.6-lunahigh | gpt-5.6-lunaxhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Contracts and boundaries | 0 / 20 | 8 / 20 |
| Retries and failures | 12 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| CI and adversarial review | 9 / 20 | 13 / 20 |
| Transactions and consistency | 14 / 20 | 12 / 20 |
| Caching and regression | 14 / 20 | 8 / 20 |
Frontend interactionSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-5.6-lunahigh | gpt-5.6-lunaxhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Layout and adaptation | 13 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Interaction behavior | 17 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| State continuity | 5 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Accessibility and feedback | 4 / 15 | 13 / 15 |
| State validation and regression | 13 / 25 | 17 / 25 |
Knowledge & ReasoningSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-5.6-lunahigh | gpt-5.6-lunaxhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Mathematical reasoning | 0 / 15 | 5 / 15 |
| Computer science & AI | 0 / 15 | 0 / 15 |
| Science and engineering | 0 / 10 | 0 / 10 |
| Life sciences and medicine | 0 / 20 | 5 / 20 |
| Humanities and general knowledge | 15 / 40 | 15 / 40 |
Visual aestheticsSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-5.6-lunahigh | gpt-5.6-lunaxhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Composition | 19 / 20 | 19 / 20 |
| Spacing and alignment | 15 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
| Typography and expression | 15 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| Color and surfaces | 19 / 20 | 19 / 20 |
| Control styling | 14 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.
MaintainabilitySubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-5.6-lunahigh | gpt-5.6-lunaxhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Semantic clarity | 15 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Control-flow organization | 16 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Locality of changes | 15 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| State and lifecycle | 17 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Implementation economy | 14 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.