Model comparison
Selected 2 / 5See the differences. Choose what matters to you.
Available modelsSelected 2 / 5
Differences vs. glm-5.3 · high
Score, cost & time differences
Current baseline · glm-5.3 · high
82Frontend interaction
Compared with glm-5.3 · high
- gpt-5.6-luna · xhigh
Frontend interaction: +1 ptsReference cost $0.025 ($0.40 less)Evaluation time 12m 59s (10m 25s less)
Differences reflect these evaluation tasks. Cost and time cover the same dimension, not a typical conversation. Scoring & cost notes
| Metric | glm-5.3 · high | gpt-5.6-luna · xhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Frontend interaction | glm-5.3high 82 | gpt-5.6-lunaxhigh 83+1 pts |
| Overall | glm-5.3high 64.40 | gpt-5.6-lunaxhigh 52.35−12.05 pts |
| Backend engineering | glm-5.3high 69 | gpt-5.6-lunaxhigh 56−13 pts |
| Knowledge & Reasoning | glm-5.3high 50 | gpt-5.6-lunaxhigh 25−25 pts |
| Visual aesthetics | glm-5.3high 66 | gpt-5.6-lunaxhigh 66Tied |
| Maintainability | glm-5.3high 68 | gpt-5.6-lunaxhigh 59−9 pts |
Frontend interaction evaluation · Evaluation consumption, not a monthly subscription fee
Cost & time
Frontend interaction evaluation| Metric | glm-5.3 · high | gpt-5.6-luna · xhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Reference cost | glm-5.3high $0.43 | gpt-5.6-lunaxhigh $0.025−$0.40 |
| Evaluation time | glm-5.3high 23m 23s | gpt-5.6-lunaxhigh 12m 59s−44.5% |
Capability profiles
Show up to five models. Select names to focus the chart.
Behind each score
Expand to inspect each subaxis.
Backend engineeringSubscores
| Scoring dimension | glm-5.3high | gpt-5.6-lunaxhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Contracts and boundaries | 10 / 20 | 8 / 20 |
| Retries and failures | 14 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| CI and adversarial review | 12 / 20 | 13 / 20 |
| Transactions and consistency | 15 / 20 | 12 / 20 |
| Caching and regression | 18 / 20 | 8 / 20 |
Frontend interactionSubscores
| Scoring dimension | glm-5.3high | gpt-5.6-lunaxhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Layout and adaptation | 20 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Interaction behavior | 20 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| State continuity | 20 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Accessibility and feedback | 7 / 15 | 13 / 15 |
| State validation and regression | 15 / 25 | 17 / 25 |
Knowledge & ReasoningSubscores
| Scoring dimension | glm-5.3high | gpt-5.6-lunaxhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Mathematical reasoning | 10 / 15 | 5 / 15 |
| Computer science & AI | 5 / 15 | 0 / 15 |
| Science and engineering | 0 / 10 | 0 / 10 |
| Life sciences and medicine | 15 / 20 | 5 / 20 |
| Humanities and general knowledge | 20 / 40 | 15 / 40 |
Visual aestheticsSubscores
| Scoring dimension | glm-5.3high | gpt-5.6-lunaxhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Composition | 19 / 20 | 19 / 20 |
| Spacing and alignment | 15 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
| Typography and expression | 17 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| Color and surfaces | 19 / 20 | 19 / 20 |
| Control styling | 17 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.
MaintainabilitySubscores
| Scoring dimension | glm-5.3high | gpt-5.6-lunaxhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Semantic clarity | 15 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Control-flow organization | 20 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Locality of changes | 17 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| State and lifecycle | 19 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Implementation economy | 17 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.