Model comparison
Selected 2 / 5See the differences. Choose what matters to you.
Available modelsSelected 2 / 5
Differences vs. glm-5.3-flash · max
Score, cost & time differences
Current baseline · glm-5.3-flash · max
54Backend engineering
Compared with glm-5.3-flash · max
- k2.8 · high
Backend engineering: tiedReference cost $0.21 ($0.19 more)Evaluation time 22m 14s (2m 0s less)
Differences reflect these evaluation tasks. Cost and time cover the same dimension, not a typical conversation. Scoring & cost notes
| Metric | glm-5.3-flash · max | k2.8 · high |
|---|---|---|
| Backend engineering | glm-5.3-flashmax 54 | k2.8high 54Tied |
| Overall | glm-5.3-flashmax 56.80 | k2.8high 63.55+6.75 pts |
| Frontend interaction | glm-5.3-flashmax 75 | k2.8high 72−3 pts |
| Knowledge & Reasoning | glm-5.3-flashmax 40 | k2.8high 70+30 pts |
| Visual aesthetics | glm-5.3-flashmax 78 | k2.8high 57−21 pts |
| Maintainability | glm-5.3-flashmax 53 | k2.8high 53Tied |
Backend engineering evaluation · Evaluation consumption, not a monthly subscription fee
Cost & time
Backend engineering evaluation| Metric | glm-5.3-flash · max | k2.8 · high |
|---|---|---|
| Reference cost | glm-5.3-flashmax $0.023 | k2.8high $0.21+$0.19 |
| Evaluation time | glm-5.3-flashmax 24m 14s | k2.8high 22m 14s−8.3% |
Capability profiles
Show up to five models. Select names to focus the chart.
Behind each score
Expand to inspect each subaxis.
Backend engineeringSubscores
| Scoring dimension | glm-5.3-flashmax | k2.8high |
|---|---|---|
| Contracts and boundaries | 7 / 20 | 9 / 20 |
| Retries and failures | 11 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| CI and adversarial review | 9 / 20 | 14 / 20 |
| Transactions and consistency | 11 / 20 | 9 / 20 |
| Caching and regression | 16 / 20 | 7 / 20 |
Frontend interactionSubscores
| Scoring dimension | glm-5.3-flashmax | k2.8high |
|---|---|---|
| Layout and adaptation | 16 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
| Interaction behavior | 17 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| State continuity | 15 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Accessibility and feedback | 8 / 15 | 10 / 15 |
| State validation and regression | 19 / 25 | 13 / 25 |
Knowledge & ReasoningSubscores
| Scoring dimension | glm-5.3-flashmax | k2.8high |
|---|---|---|
| Mathematical reasoning | 5 / 15 | 5 / 15 |
| Computer science & AI | 5 / 15 | 5 / 15 |
| Science and engineering | 5 / 10 | 5 / 10 |
| Life sciences and medicine | 10 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Humanities and general knowledge | 15 / 40 | 35 / 40 |
Visual aestheticsSubscores
| Scoring dimension | glm-5.3-flashmax | k2.8high |
|---|---|---|
| Composition | 19 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
| Spacing and alignment | 17 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| Typography and expression | 18 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
| Color and surfaces | 20 / 20 | 19 / 20 |
| Control styling | 18 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.
MaintainabilitySubscores
| Scoring dimension | glm-5.3-flashmax | k2.8high |
|---|---|---|
| Semantic clarity | 15 / 20 | 14 / 20 |
| Control-flow organization | 18 / 20 | 19 / 20 |
| Locality of changes | 15 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| State and lifecycle | 16 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| Implementation economy | 17 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.