Back to rankings

Model comparison

Selected 2 / 5

See the differences. Choose what matters to you.

Differences vs. glm-5.3-flash · high

Compare settings
Quick select
These models share no common effort
Score, cost & time differences

Current baseline · glm-5.3-flash · high

20Knowledge & Reasoning

Compared with glm-5.3-flash · high

  • Qwen 3.8 27b · default

    Knowledge & Reasoning: tiedComparable cost unavailableEvaluation time 55m 1s (14m 42s more)

Differences reflect these evaluation tasks. Cost and time cover the same dimension, not a typical conversation. Scoring & cost notes

Tested configuration
Effort
Effortdefault
Metricglm-5.3-flash · highQwen 3.8 27b · default
Knowledge & Reasoningglm-5.3-flashhigh
20
Qwen 3.8 27bdefault
20Tied
Overallglm-5.3-flashhigh
49.60
Qwen 3.8 27bdefault
53.00+3.4 pts
Backend engineeringglm-5.3-flashhigh
55
Qwen 3.8 27bdefault
64+9 pts
Frontend interactionglm-5.3-flashhigh
76
Qwen 3.8 27bdefault
87+11 pts
Visual aestheticsglm-5.3-flashhigh
70
Qwen 3.8 27bdefault
66−4 pts
Maintainabilityglm-5.3-flashhigh
59
Qwen 3.8 27bdefault
59Tied

Next, validate with your own work

Try a familiar task with each candidate. Compare the results, revision effort, and actual consumption.

Explore subscriptions for these modelsUsing an API? Refer to the evaluation consumption above. For subscriptions, explore matching plans and estimated runtime.