Back to rankings

Model comparison

Selected 2 / 5

See the differences. Choose what matters to you.

Differences vs. glm-5.3-flash · high

Compare settings
Quick select
Score, cost & time differences

Current baseline · glm-5.3-flash · high

76Frontend interaction

Compared with glm-5.3-flash · high

  • deepseek-v4-flash · high

    Frontend interaction: tiedReference cost $0.067 ($0.043 more)Evaluation time 16m 48s (12m 55s less)

Differences reflect these evaluation tasks. Cost and time cover the same dimension, not a typical conversation. Scoring & cost notes

Tested configuration
Effort
Effort
Metricglm-5.3-flash · highdeepseek-v4-flash · high
Frontend interactionglm-5.3-flashhigh
76
deepseek-v4-flashhigh
76Tied
Overallglm-5.3-flashhigh
49.60
deepseek-v4-flashhigh
60.50+10.9 pts
Backend engineeringglm-5.3-flashhigh
55
deepseek-v4-flashhigh
58+3 pts
Knowledge & Reasoningglm-5.3-flashhigh
20
deepseek-v4-flashhigh
55+35 pts
Visual aestheticsglm-5.3-flashhigh
70
deepseek-v4-flashhigh
61−9 pts
Maintainabilityglm-5.3-flashhigh
59
deepseek-v4-flashhigh
53−6 pts

Next, validate with your own work

Try a familiar task with each candidate. Compare the results, revision effort, and actual consumption.

Explore subscriptions for these modelsUsing an API? Refer to the evaluation consumption above. For subscriptions, explore matching plans and estimated runtime.