Back to rankings

Model comparison

Selected 2 / 5

See the differences. Choose what matters to you.

Differences vs. deepseek-v4-flash · high

Compare settings
Quick select
These models share no common effort
Score, cost & time differences

Current baseline · deepseek-v4-flash · high

58Backend engineering

Compared with deepseek-v4-flash · high

  • mimo-v2.6-flash · default

    Backend engineering: tiedReference cost $0.043 ($0.047 less)Evaluation time 35m 36s (24m 0s more)

Differences reflect these evaluation tasks. Cost and time cover the same dimension, not a typical conversation. Scoring & cost notes

Tested configuration
Effort
Effortdefault
Metricdeepseek-v4-flash · highmimo-v2.6-flash · default
Backend engineeringdeepseek-v4-flashhigh
58
mimo-v2.6-flashdefault
58Tied
Overalldeepseek-v4-flashhigh
60.50
mimo-v2.6-flashdefault
56.10−4.4 pts
Frontend interactiondeepseek-v4-flashhigh
76
mimo-v2.6-flashdefault
71−5 pts
Knowledge & Reasoningdeepseek-v4-flashhigh
55
mimo-v2.6-flashdefault
45−10 pts
Visual aestheticsdeepseek-v4-flashhigh
61
mimo-v2.6-flashdefault
59−2 pts
Maintainabilitydeepseek-v4-flashhigh
53
mimo-v2.6-flashdefault
57+4 pts

Next, validate with your own work

Try a familiar task with each candidate. Compare the results, revision effort, and actual consumption.

Explore subscriptions for these modelsUsing an API? Refer to the evaluation consumption above. For subscriptions, explore matching plans and estimated runtime.