Back to rankings

Model comparison

Selected 2 / 5

See the differences. Choose what matters to you.

Differences vs. deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017 · xhigh

Compare settings
Quick select
Score, cost & time differences

Current baseline · deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017 · xhigh

83Frontend interaction

Compared with deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017 · xhigh

  • gpt-5.6-luna · xhigh

    Frontend interaction: tiedReference cost $0.025 ($0.031 less)Evaluation time 12m 59s (6m 27s more)

Differences reflect these evaluation tasks. Cost and time cover the same dimension, not a typical conversation. Scoring & cost notes

Tested configuration
Effort
Effort
Metricdeepseek-v4.1-flash-1017 · xhighgpt-5.6-luna · xhigh
Frontend interactiondeepseek-v4.1-flash-1017xhigh
83
gpt-5.6-lunaxhigh
83Tied
Overalldeepseek-v4.1-flash-1017xhigh
69.90
gpt-5.6-lunaxhigh
52.35−17.55 pts
Backend engineeringdeepseek-v4.1-flash-1017xhigh
64
gpt-5.6-lunaxhigh
56−8 pts
Knowledge & Reasoningdeepseek-v4.1-flash-1017xhigh
75
gpt-5.6-lunaxhigh
25−50 pts
Visual aestheticsdeepseek-v4.1-flash-1017xhigh
57
gpt-5.6-lunaxhigh
66+9 pts
Maintainabilitydeepseek-v4.1-flash-1017xhigh
57
gpt-5.6-lunaxhigh
59+2 pts

Next, validate with your own work

Try a familiar task with each candidate. Compare the results, revision effort, and actual consumption.

Explore subscriptions for these modelsUsing an API? Refer to the evaluation consumption above. For subscriptions, explore matching plans and estimated runtime.