Back to rankings

Model comparison

Selected 2 / 5

See the differences. Choose what matters to you.

Differences vs. deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017 · high

Compare settings
Quick select
Score, cost & time differences

Current baseline · deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017 · high

85Frontend interaction

Compared with deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017 · high

  • gpt-6.1-terra · medium

    Frontend interaction: tiedReference cost $0.072 ($0.009 more)Evaluation time 1m 2s (6m 0s less)

Differences reflect these evaluation tasks. Cost and time cover the same dimension, not a typical conversation. Scoring & cost notes

Tested configuration
Effort
Effort
Metricdeepseek-v4.1-flash-1017 · highgpt-6.1-terra · medium
Frontend interactiondeepseek-v4.1-flash-1017high
85
gpt-6.1-terramedium
85Tied
Overalldeepseek-v4.1-flash-1017high
70.10
gpt-6.1-terramedium
67.20−2.9 pts
Backend engineeringdeepseek-v4.1-flash-1017high
64
gpt-6.1-terramedium
55−9 pts
Knowledge & Reasoningdeepseek-v4.1-flash-1017high
70
gpt-6.1-terramedium
75+5 pts
Visual aestheticsdeepseek-v4.1-flash-1017high
66
gpt-6.1-terramedium
47−19 pts
Maintainabilitydeepseek-v4.1-flash-1017high
59
gpt-6.1-terramedium
59Tied

Next, validate with your own work

Try a familiar task with each candidate. Compare the results, revision effort, and actual consumption.

Explore subscriptions for these modelsUsing an API? Refer to the evaluation consumption above. For subscriptions, explore matching plans and estimated runtime.