Back to rankings

Model comparison

Selected 2 / 5

See the differences. Choose what matters to you.

Differences vs. deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017 · high

Compare settings
Quick select
Score, cost & time differences

Current baseline · deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017 · high

64Backend engineering

Compared with deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017 · high

  • claude-opus-4-8 · max

    Backend engineering: tiedReference cost $8.37 ($8.30 more)Evaluation time 63m 16s (55m 16s more)

Differences reflect these evaluation tasks. Cost and time cover the same dimension, not a typical conversation. Scoring & cost notes

Tested configuration
Effort
Effort
Metricdeepseek-v4.1-flash-1017 · highclaude-opus-4-8 · max
Backend engineeringdeepseek-v4.1-flash-1017high
64
claude-opus-4-8max
64Tied
Overalldeepseek-v4.1-flash-1017high
70.10
claude-opus-4-8max
75.85+5.75 pts
Frontend interactiondeepseek-v4.1-flash-1017high
85
claude-opus-4-8max
88+3 pts
Knowledge & Reasoningdeepseek-v4.1-flash-1017high
70
claude-opus-4-8max
85+15 pts
Visual aestheticsdeepseek-v4.1-flash-1017high
66
claude-opus-4-8max
68+2 pts
Maintainabilitydeepseek-v4.1-flash-1017high
59
claude-opus-4-8max
55−4 pts

Next, validate with your own work

Try a familiar task with each candidate. Compare the results, revision effort, and actual consumption.

Explore subscriptions for these modelsUsing an API? Refer to the evaluation consumption above. For subscriptions, explore matching plans and estimated runtime.