Model comparison
Selected 2 / 5See the differences. Choose what matters to you.
Available modelsSelected 2 / 5
Differences vs. claude-opus-5 · max
Score, cost & time differences
Current baseline · claude-opus-5 · max
87Frontend interaction
Compared with claude-opus-5 · max
- dot · Undisclosed
Frontend interaction: tiedComparable cost unavailableEvaluation time 2m 32s (22m 12s less)
Differences reflect these evaluation tasks. Cost and time cover the same dimension, not a typical conversation. Scoring & cost notes
| Metric | claude-opus-5 · max | dot · Undisclosed |
|---|---|---|
| Frontend interaction | claude-opus-5max 87 | dotUndisclosed 87Tied |
| Overall | claude-opus-5max 81.70 | dotUndisclosed 81.95+0.25 pts |
| Backend engineering | claude-opus-5max 70 | dotUndisclosed 85+15 pts |
| Knowledge & Reasoning | claude-opus-5max 95 | dotUndisclosed 85−10 pts |
| Visual aesthetics | claude-opus-5max 73 | dotUndisclosed 70−3 pts |
| Maintainability | claude-opus-5max 61 | dotUndisclosed 73+12 pts |
Frontend interaction evaluation · Evaluation consumption, not a monthly subscription fee
Cost & time
Frontend interaction evaluation| Metric | claude-opus-5 · max | dot · Undisclosed |
|---|---|---|
| Reference cost | claude-opus-5max $3.20 | dotUndisclosed N/A |
| Evaluation time | claude-opus-5max 24m 45s | dotUndisclosed 2m 32s−89.7% |
Capability profiles
Show up to five models. Select names to focus the chart.
Behind each score
Expand to inspect each subaxis.
Backend engineeringSubscores
| Scoring dimension | claude-opus-5max | dotUndisclosed |
|---|---|---|
| Contracts and boundaries | 11 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Retries and failures | 15 / 20 | 19 / 20 |
| CI and adversarial review | 14 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Transactions and consistency | 15 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
| Caching and regression | 15 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
Frontend interactionSubscores
| Scoring dimension | claude-opus-5max | dotUndisclosed |
|---|---|---|
| Layout and adaptation | 20 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Interaction behavior | 20 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| State continuity | 20 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Accessibility and feedback | 12 / 15 | 13 / 15 |
| State validation and regression | 15 / 25 | 21 / 25 |
Knowledge & ReasoningSubscores
| Scoring dimension | claude-opus-5max | dotUndisclosed |
|---|---|---|
| Mathematical reasoning | 15 / 15 | 15 / 15 |
| Computer science & AI | 10 / 15 | 15 / 15 |
| Science and engineering | 10 / 10 | 10 / 10 |
| Life sciences and medicine | 20 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Humanities and general knowledge | 40 / 40 | 30 / 40 |
Visual aestheticsSubscores
| Scoring dimension | claude-opus-5max | dotUndisclosed |
|---|---|---|
| Composition | 18 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Spacing and alignment | 18 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Typography and expression | 18 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| Color and surfaces | 19 / 20 | 19 / 20 |
| Control styling | 17 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.
MaintainabilitySubscores
| Scoring dimension | claude-opus-5max | dotUndisclosed |
|---|---|---|
| Semantic clarity | 15 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
| Control-flow organization | 20 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Locality of changes | 16 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
| State and lifecycle | 18 / 20 | 19 / 20 |
| Implementation economy | 16 / 20 | 19 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.