Model comparison
Selected 2 / 5See the differences. Choose what matters to you.
Available modelsSelected 2 / 5
Differences vs. claude-opus-5 · high
Score, cost & time differences
Current baseline · claude-opus-5 · high
85Frontend interaction
Compared with claude-opus-5 · high
- claude-opus-5 · xhigh
Frontend interaction: +2 ptsReference cost $3.17 ($0.80 more)Evaluation time 26m 6s (6m 34s more)
Differences reflect these evaluation tasks. Cost and time cover the same dimension, not a typical conversation. Scoring & cost notes
| Metric | claude-opus-5 · high | claude-opus-5 · xhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Frontend interaction | claude-opus-5high 85 | claude-opus-5xhigh 87+2 pts |
| Overall | claude-opus-5high 76.95 | claude-opus-5xhigh 77.75+0.8 pts |
| Backend engineering | claude-opus-5high 68 | claude-opus-5xhigh 74+6 pts |
| Knowledge & Reasoning | claude-opus-5high 90 | claude-opus-5xhigh 85−5 pts |
| Visual aesthetics | claude-opus-5high 61 | claude-opus-5xhigh 66+5 pts |
| Maintainability | claude-opus-5high 57 | claude-opus-5xhigh 59+2 pts |
Frontend interaction evaluation · Evaluation consumption, not a monthly subscription fee
Cost & time
Frontend interaction evaluation| Metric | claude-opus-5 · high | claude-opus-5 · xhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Reference cost | claude-opus-5high $2.37 | claude-opus-5xhigh $3.17+$0.80 |
| Evaluation time | claude-opus-5high 19m 33s | claude-opus-5xhigh 26m 6s+33.6% |
Capability profiles
Show up to five models. Select names to focus the chart.
Behind each score
Expand to inspect each subaxis.
Backend engineeringSubscores
| Scoring dimension | claude-opus-5high | claude-opus-5xhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Contracts and boundaries | 11 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
| Retries and failures | 17 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| CI and adversarial review | 10 / 20 | 12 / 20 |
| Transactions and consistency | 14 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Caching and regression | 16 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
Frontend interactionSubscores
| Scoring dimension | claude-opus-5high | claude-opus-5xhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Layout and adaptation | 18 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Interaction behavior | 20 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| State continuity | 15 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Accessibility and feedback | 13 / 15 | 13 / 15 |
| State validation and regression | 19 / 25 | 21 / 25 |
Knowledge & ReasoningSubscores
| Scoring dimension | claude-opus-5high | claude-opus-5xhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Mathematical reasoning | 15 / 15 | 15 / 15 |
| Computer science & AI | 5 / 15 | 5 / 15 |
| Science and engineering | 10 / 10 | 10 / 10 |
| Life sciences and medicine | 20 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Humanities and general knowledge | 40 / 40 | 35 / 40 |
Visual aestheticsSubscores
| Scoring dimension | claude-opus-5high | claude-opus-5xhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Composition | 19 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Spacing and alignment | 16 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| Typography and expression | 16 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
| Color and surfaces | 18 / 20 | 19 / 20 |
| Control styling | 16 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.
MaintainabilitySubscores
| Scoring dimension | claude-opus-5high | claude-opus-5xhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Semantic clarity | 15 / 20 | 14 / 20 |
| Control-flow organization | 19 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Locality of changes | 15 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
| State and lifecycle | 17 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| Implementation economy | 17 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.