Model comparison
Selected 2 / 5See the differences. Choose what matters to you.
Available modelsSelected 2 / 5
Differences vs. claude-opus-5-5 · max
Score, cost & time differences
Current baseline · claude-opus-5-5 · max
89.15Overall
Compared with claude-opus-5-5 · max
- gpt-6-astra · xhigh
Overall: −0.35 ptsReference cost $7.01 ($6.40 less)Evaluation time 83m 56s (17m 54s more)
Differences reflect these evaluation tasks. Cost and time cover the same dimension, not a typical conversation. Scoring & cost notes
| Metric | claude-opus-5-5 · max | gpt-6-astra · xhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | claude-opus-5-5max 89.15 | gpt-6-astraxhigh 88.80−0.35 pts |
| Backend engineering | claude-opus-5-5max 84 | gpt-6-astraxhigh 95+11 pts |
| Frontend interaction | claude-opus-5-5max 97 | gpt-6-astraxhigh 96−1 pts |
| Knowledge & Reasoning | claude-opus-5-5max 100 | gpt-6-astraxhigh 95−5 pts |
| Visual aesthetics | claude-opus-5-5max 73 | gpt-6-astraxhigh 75+2 pts |
| Maintainability | claude-opus-5-5max 70 | gpt-6-astraxhigh 61−9 pts |
Complete evaluation · Evaluation consumption, not a monthly subscription fee
Cost & time
Complete evaluation| Metric | claude-opus-5-5 · max | gpt-6-astra · xhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Reference cost | claude-opus-5-5max $13.41 | gpt-6-astraxhigh $7.01−$6.40 |
| Evaluation time | claude-opus-5-5max 66m 3s | gpt-6-astraxhigh 83m 56s+27.1% |
Capability profiles
Show up to five models. Select names to focus the chart.
Behind each score
Expand to inspect each subaxis.
Backend engineeringSubscores
| Scoring dimension | claude-opus-5-5max | gpt-6-astraxhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Contracts and boundaries | 18 / 20 | 19 / 20 |
| Retries and failures | 16 / 20 | 19 / 20 |
| CI and adversarial review | 16 / 20 | 19 / 20 |
| Transactions and consistency | 16 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Caching and regression | 18 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
Frontend interactionSubscores
| Scoring dimension | claude-opus-5-5max | gpt-6-astraxhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Layout and adaptation | 20 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Interaction behavior | 20 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| State continuity | 20 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Accessibility and feedback | 12 / 15 | 13 / 15 |
| State validation and regression | 25 / 25 | 23 / 25 |
Knowledge & ReasoningSubscores
| Scoring dimension | claude-opus-5-5max | gpt-6-astraxhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Mathematical reasoning | 15 / 15 | 15 / 15 |
| Computer science & AI | 15 / 15 | 15 / 15 |
| Science and engineering | 10 / 10 | 10 / 10 |
| Life sciences and medicine | 20 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Humanities and general knowledge | 40 / 40 | 35 / 40 |
Visual aestheticsSubscores
| Scoring dimension | claude-opus-5-5max | gpt-6-astraxhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Composition | 19 / 20 | 19 / 20 |
| Spacing and alignment | 18 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
| Typography and expression | 18 / 20 | 19 / 20 |
| Color and surfaces | 19 / 20 | 19 / 20 |
| Control styling | 16 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.
MaintainabilitySubscores
| Scoring dimension | claude-opus-5-5max | gpt-6-astraxhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Semantic clarity | 16 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Control-flow organization | 20 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Locality of changes | 18 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
| State and lifecycle | 18 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Implementation economy | 17 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.